SoftwareGlimpse

Five9 vs Grasshopper

Compare Five9 and Grasshopper on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources8 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Five9 logo

Five9

8.2/10

Cloud contact center (CCaaS) — Digital from $119/concurrent seat/mo; Core $159; Plus/Pro/Enterprise quote — 50-seat minimum.

Best for

  • Mid-market and enterprise contact centres that need blended dialer strength
  • Teams comfortable with concurrent-seat economics and 50+ seat minimums
  • Buyers who want CRM/UC adapter choice inside CCaaS

Starting from $119.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Five9 is better for

  • Power dialer
  • WhatsApp Business
  • CRM / CTI integrations
  • Routing & IVR

Tie

  • Number / country coverage

Choose Five9 if: Mid-market and enterprise contact centres that need blended dialer strength

Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number

See detailed comparison ↓
Grasshopper logo

Grasshopper

6.2/10

SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).

Best for

  • Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
  • SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
  • Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line

Starting from $14.00/user/mo

No free plan

Frequently asked questions

Common buyer questions about Five9 vs Grasshopper.

  • No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.