SoftwareGlimpse

Deputy vs Workable

Compare Deputy and Workable on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
Deputy logo

Deputy

8.2/10

Mid-market hourly WFM — Lite $5 / Core $6.50 / Pro $9 per user/mo; $30 invoice minimum; up to 31-day trial.

Best for

  • Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance
  • Teams that will trial Core for up to 31 days before Homebase-style SMB hubs
  • Ops leaders who want WFM AI with a human-in-the-loop

Starting from $5.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Deputy is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Integrations

Choose Deputy if: Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance

Choose Workable if: SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices

See detailed comparison ↓
Workable logo

Workable

7.2/10

Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.

Best for

  • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
  • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
  • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS

Starting from $299.00/user/mo

No free plan

Deputy vs Workable at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDeputy

    Deputy

    Workable

  • Free planDepends

    Deputy

    Workable

  • User / licence minimumDepends

    Deputy

    Workable

  • IntegrationsDeputy

    Deputy

    Workable

Which HR software is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Deputy

    Best for starting pricing

    Deputy publishes a lower researched starting floor ($5/mo vs $299/mo for Workable). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

  • Deputy

    Best for integrations

    Deputy leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Deputy wins

    Deputy

    Deputy publishes a lower researched starting floor ($5/mo vs $299/mo for Workable). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

    Workable

    Trails Deputy on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Deputy if

  • Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance
  • Teams that will trial Core for up to 31 days before Homebase-style SMB hubs
  • Ops leaders who want WFM AI with a human-in-the-loop

Choose Workable if

  • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
  • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
  • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Deputy and Workable?

Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.