SoftwareGlimpse

Close vs Keap

Compare Close and Keap on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20268 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Close logo

Close

7.4/10

Sales-focused CRM for pipeline management and sales engagement workflows.

Best for

  • Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM
  • Teams that need dialing power and advanced outreach workflows
  • Teams that rely on calling, email, and SMS from the CRM

Starting from $9.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Close and Keap. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Close is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Pipeline management
  • Email capabilities
  • Reporting

Keap is better for

  • Sales automation

Tie

  • Customization
  • Integrations

Choose Close if: Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM

Choose Keap if: Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators

See detailed comparison ↓
Keap logo

Keap

7/10

Best for

  • Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators
  • Email/SMS campaigns and automations are first-class
  • Built for small businesses that want CRM plus marketing automation, payments, and proven campaign automations in one platform.

Starting from $249.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Close and Keap. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Close

    Close leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close8/10
    Keap7/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    Close

    Close leads on pipeline management (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close8/10
    Keap7/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    Keap

    Keap leads on sales automation (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close8/10
    Keap9/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    Close

    Stronger call functionality availability

    Close8/10
    Keap8/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Close

    Stronger coverage across reporting, forecasting. editorial scores are close (7/10 vs 7/10).

    Close7/10
    Keap7/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    Tie

    Close and Keap are close on customization (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close7/10
    Keap7/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Close and Keap are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close7/10
    Keap7/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    Close

    Close leads on administration (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    CloseStronger
    KeapWeaker
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    Close

    Close leads on scalability (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close8/10
    Keap6/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Depends

    Close researched starting price $9/user/mo vs Keap $249/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

    Close6/10
    Keap6/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.