SoftwareGlimpse

Bitrix24 vs Keap

Compare Bitrix24 and Keap on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20265 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Bitrix24 logo

Bitrix24

6.8/10

Free-tier all-in-one CRM and collaboration suite with organization-based paid cloud plans.

Best for

  • Bitrix24 fits many small-business CRM evaluations
  • Bitrix24 is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool
  • Bitrix24 is an all-in-one CRM and collaboration suite with a free tier and organization-based cloud pricing.

Starting from €0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Bitrix24 and Keap. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Bitrix24 is better for

  • Pipeline management
  • Customization
  • Scalability
  • Value for money

Keap is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities
  • Reporting

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose Bitrix24 if: Bitrix24 fits many small-business CRM evaluations

Choose Keap if: Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators

See detailed comparison ↓
Keap logo

Keap

7/10

Best for

  • Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators
  • Email/SMS campaigns and automations are first-class
  • Built for small businesses that want CRM plus marketing automation, payments, and proven campaign automations in one platform.

Starting from $249.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Bitrix24 and Keap. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Keap

    Keap leads on ease of use (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix246/10
    Keap7/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    Bitrix24

    Stronger coverage across pipeline management, deal management, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (7/10 vs 7/10).

    Bitrix247/10
    Keap7/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    Keap

    Keap leads on sales automation (7/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix247/10
    Keap9/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    Keap

    Keap leads on email capabilities (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix246/10
    Keap8/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Keap

    Keap leads on reporting (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix246/10
    Keap7/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    Bitrix24

    Bitrix24 leads on customization (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix248/10
    Keap7/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Bitrix24 and Keap are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix247/10
    Keap7/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    Keap

    Keap leads on administration (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix24Weaker
    KeapStronger
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    Bitrix24

    Bitrix24 leads on scalability (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix248/10
    Keap6/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Bitrix24

    Better for value for money

    Bitrix248/10
    Keap6/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.