SoftwareGlimpse

Bitrix24 vs Keap

Compare Bitrix24 and Keap on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20265 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Bitrix24 logo

Bitrix24

6.8/10

Free-tier all-in-one CRM and collaboration suite with organization-based paid cloud plans.

Best for

  • Bitrix24 fits many small-business CRM evaluations
  • Bitrix24 is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool
  • Bitrix24 is an all-in-one CRM and collaboration suite with a free tier and organization-based cloud pricing.

Starting from €0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Bitrix24 and Keap. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Bitrix24 is better for

  • Pipeline management
  • Customization
  • Scalability
  • Value for money

Keap is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities
  • Reporting

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose Bitrix24 if: Bitrix24 fits many small-business CRM evaluations

Choose Keap if: Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators

See detailed comparison ↓
Keap logo

Keap

7/10

Best for

  • Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators
  • Email/SMS campaigns and automations are first-class
  • Built for small businesses that want CRM plus marketing automation, payments, and proven campaign automations in one platform.

Starting from $249.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

5

Criteria

10

Screenshots

22

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Bitrix24 PricesBitrix24official-pricing-page
Bitrix24Bitrix24official-product-page
Keap PricingKeapofficial-pricing-page
Keap HomepageKeapofficial-product-page
Keap CRM SoftwareKeapofficial-product-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.