SoftwareGlimpse

Bitrix24 vs folk

Compare Bitrix24 and folk on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20266 evidence sources26 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Bitrix24 logo

Bitrix24

6.8/10

Free-tier all-in-one CRM and collaboration suite with organization-based paid cloud plans.

Best for

  • Bitrix24 fits many small-business CRM evaluations
  • Bitrix24 is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool
  • Bitrix24 is an all-in-one CRM and collaboration suite with a free tier and organization-based cloud pricing.

Starting from €0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Bitrix24 and folk. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Bitrix24 is better for

  • Pipeline management
  • Reporting
  • Customization
  • Scalability

folk is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Email capabilities
  • Integrations
  • Administration

Tie

  • Sales automation

Choose Bitrix24 if: Bitrix24 fits many small-business CRM evaluations

Choose folk if: Standard/Premium fit collaborative SMB relationship selling

See detailed comparison ↓
folk logo

folk

7.1/10

Simple relationship CRM for organizing contacts and collaborative outreach.

Best for

  • Standard/Premium fit collaborative SMB relationship selling
  • Relationship CRM + LinkedIn capture fits founders and small teams
  • Pipelines, sequences, and AI assistants support sales workflows

Starting from $24.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Bitrix24 and folk. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    folk

    folk leads on ease of use (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix246/10
    folk8/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    Bitrix24

    Stronger deal management availability

    Bitrix247/10
    folk7/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    Tie

    Bitrix24 and folk are close on sales automation (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix247/10
    folk7/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    folk

    folk leads on email capabilities (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix246/10
    folk8/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Bitrix24

    Stronger reporting availability

    Bitrix246/10
    folk6/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    Bitrix24

    Bitrix24 leads on customization (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix248/10
    folk7/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    folk

    folk leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix247/10
    folk8/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    folk

    folk leads on administration (5/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix24Weaker
    folkStronger
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    Bitrix24

    Bitrix24 leads on scalability (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Bitrix248/10
    folk6/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Depends

    Bitrix24 researched starting price $0/user/mo vs folk $24/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

    Bitrix248/10
    folk7/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.