Ashby vs Workable
Ashby fits startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ats+analytics platform; Workable fits smb and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ats with published prices.
Ashby
Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.
Best for
- • Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
- • TA teams comparing Ashby vs Greenhouse for AI-native hiring
- • Orgs willing to pay a high Foundations floor instead of a free ATS
Starting from $400.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Ashby and Workable. Choose Ashby when Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform. Choose Workable when SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Ashby is better for
- ✓ Integrations
Workable is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
Choose Ashby if: Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
Choose Workable if: SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
Workable
Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.
Best for
- • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
- • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
- • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS
Starting from $299.00/user/mo
No free plan
Quick verdict
Start here — then dig into the evidence below.
Choose Ashby if…
- Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
- TA teams comparing Ashby vs Greenhouse for AI-native hiring
- Orgs willing to pay a high Foundations floor instead of a free ATS
- You prioritize integrations
Choose Workable if…
- SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
- Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
- Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS
- You prioritize starting pricing
Overall recommendation
There is no universal winner between Ashby and Workable. Choose Ashby when Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform. Choose Workable when SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Key trade-off
Ashby trades toward integrations; Workable trades toward starting pricing.
Winner by category
Only dimensions with researched evidence for this pair.
| Dimension | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Starting pricing | Workable wins | Workable publishes a lower researched starting floor ($299/mo vs $400/mo for Ashby). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner. |
| Integrations | Ashby wins | Ashby leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing. |
Side-by-side feature matrix
Normalized availability from product research — empty rows are not shown.
Hiring
| Feature | Ashby | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant tracking | Strong | Strong |
| Career site & job boards | Strong | Strong |
| Interview scheduling | Strong | Strong |
Workforce
| Feature | Ashby | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Workforce scheduling | Limited | Limited |
| Frontline communications | Limited | Limited |
| Time & attendance | Limited | Moderate |
| GPS / geofence clock-in | Limited | Limited |
People & payroll
| Feature | Ashby | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Core HRIS | Limited | Moderate |
| Payroll processing | Limited | Moderate |
| Benefits administration | Limited | Limited |
Training
| Feature | Ashby | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| SOP / knowledge base | Limited | Limited |
| Employee training paths | Limited | Moderate |
| LMS / course commerce | Limited | Limited |
Platform
| Feature | Ashby | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| HRIS integrations | Strong | Strong |
| Analytics & reporting | Strong | Strong |
| AI assistance | Moderate | Moderate |
Pricing comparison
Pricing evidence last checked Sep 9, 2026.
Ashby
From $400.00/user/mo
- All-in-One Foundations$400.00/mo
- All-in-One PlusCustom
- All-in-One EnterpriseCustom
Workable
From $299.00/user/mo
- Standard$299.00/mo
- Premier$599.00/mo
- Enterprise$719.00/mo
Seat-count estimates
Labeled estimates from verified starting per-seat pricing — not invoices.
| Seats | Ashby | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | ~$2,000.00/mo (5 × starting seat) | ~$1,495.00/mo (5 × starting seat) |
| 10 | ~$4,000.00/mo (10 × starting seat) | ~$2,990.00/mo (10 × starting seat) |
| 25 | ~$10,000.00/mo (25 × starting seat) | ~$7,475.00/mo (25 × starting seat) |
| 50 | ~$20,000.00/mo (50 × starting seat) | ~$14,950.00/mo (50 × starting seat) |
Estimate from verified starting per-seat pricing — actual total depends on plan, annual discounts, and add-ons.
Ashby researched starting price from $400/mo. Workable researched starting price from $299/mo. Affiliate economics excluded.
Best for
Scenario picks from researched strengths — not a universal ranking.
- → Ashby
Best for integrations
Ashby leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
- → Workable
Best for starting pricing
Workable publishes a lower researched starting floor ($299/mo vs $400/mo for Ashby). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.
The differences that actually matter
Pair-specific analysis for Ashby vs Workable — not generic category copy.
Starting pricing
Workable aheadOn starting pricing, Workable is ahead. Ashby: Trails Workable on this criterion. Workable: Workable publishes a lower researched starting floor ($299/mo vs $400/mo for Ashby). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.. Feature evidence also diverges on Time & attendance (Ashby: Limited; Workable: Moderate); Core HRIS (Ashby: Limited; Workable: Moderate); Payroll processing (Ashby: Limited; Workable: Moderate).
Pros and cons
Product-specific for this pair — derived from researched outcomes and editorial notes.
Ashby
Pros
- Stronger on integrations
Cons
- Trails on starting pricing
Workable
Pros
- Stronger on starting pricing
Cons
- Trails on integrations
Who should not choose each product
Decision quality improves when we say who should walk away.
Don't choose Ashby if…
- You need Workable's stronger starting pricing more than Ashby's strengths
- Your primary fit looks closer to: SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
- Your primary fit looks closer to: Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
Don't choose Workable if…
- You need Ashby's stronger integrations more than Workable's strengths
- Your primary fit looks closer to: Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
- Your primary fit looks closer to: TA teams comparing Ashby vs Greenhouse for AI-native hiring
Alternatives worth considering
When neither product is the right fit.
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
ATS + recruiting CRM under Employ — custom quote (Core AI-powered hiring platform plus Insights/VONQ/Onboarding add-ons); demo-led, no published seat $.
Mid-market ATS with free Bootstrap, paid Startup/Growth/Business pools, career site, and interview workflows — Growth from $273/mo annual.
SMB/mid-market core HRIS with Core/Pro/Elite PEPM tiers — Core from $10/employee/mo above 25 employees, or $250/mo flat floor for smaller teams.
Final verdict
Scenario-level close — not a repeat of the intro.
Ashby wins when…
Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
Workable wins when…
SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
- Best for integrationsAshby
- Best for starting pricingWorkable
Which one should you choose?
Choose Ashby if:
- Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
- TA teams comparing Ashby vs Greenhouse for AI-native hiring
- Orgs willing to pay a high Foundations floor instead of a free ATS
Choose Workable if:
- SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
- Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
- Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS
Product screenshots
Real product UI from our media library — no placeholders.
Ashby
Workable
FAQ
- Is Ashby better than Workable?
- There is no universal winner between Ashby and Workable. Choose Ashby when Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform. Choose Workable when SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
- Which HR software fits which team?
- Ashby: Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform Workable: SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
- Does Ashby or Workable have a free plan?
- Ashby: No free plan. Workable: No free plan.
- How does Ashby vs Workable pricing compare?
- Ashby starts from $400.00/user/mo. Workable starts from $299.00/user/mo. Confirm live vendor pricing before purchasing.
- How did SoftwareGlimpse compare these products?
- We map both products to the same category criteria, then evaluate trade-offs using verified product, pricing and feature evidence. Affiliate relationships never change outcomes.
- reviewAshby review
- reviewWorkable review
- pricingAshby pricing
- pricingWorkable pricing
- alternativeGreenhouse alternative
- alternativeLever alternative
- alternativeBreezy HR alternative
- guideWhat Is HR Software?
- guideHow to Choose HR Software
- guideHR Software Pricing Guide
- categoryHR software hub
- finderBest HR software
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider
Greenhouse
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
Lever
ATS + recruiting CRM under Employ — custom quote (Core AI-powered hiring platform plus Insights/VONQ/Onboarding add-ons); demo-led, no published seat $.
Breezy HR
Mid-market ATS with free Bootstrap, paid Startup/Growth/Business pools, career site, and interview workflows — Growth from $273/mo annual.
BambooHR
SMB/mid-market core HRIS with Core/Pro/Elite PEPM tiers — Core from $10/employee/mo above 25 employees, or $250/mo flat floor for smaller teams.
Still deciding between Ashby and Workable?
Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.
Part of Software comparisons · HR Software hub
Try a decision tool
Interactive helpers use recommendation criteria — affiliate status never changes outcomes.