SoftwareGlimpse

Greenhouse vs Workable

Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring (kits, scorecards, governance) at mid-market/enterprise. Choose Workable for a dedicated ATS with published SMB floors and a trial. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare

Compare another

Greenhouse

8/10

Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.

Best for

• Structured hiring kits/scorecards
• Enterprise/mid TA teams

No free plan

Visit Greenhouse

VS

Our verdict

No universal winner

Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring (kits, scorecards, governance) at mid-market/enterprise. Choose Workable for a dedicated ATS with published SMB floors and a trial.

Greenhouse is better for

✓ Hiring workflow
✓ Integrations

Workable is better for

✓ Core HRIS depth
✓ Payroll processing
✓ Training depth
✓ Time tracking depth

Tie

• Scheduling depth

Choose Greenhouse if: Structured hiring kits/scorecards

Choose Workable if: Published ATS floors + 15-day trial

See detailed comparison ↓

Workable

7.2/10

Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.

Best for

• Published ATS floors + 15-day trial
• SMB recruiting with light HR

Starting from $299.00/user/mo

No free plan

Greenhouse vs Workable at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

Starting pricingDepends
Greenhouse
Workable
Free planDepends
Greenhouse
Workable
User / licence minimumDepends
Greenhouse
Workable
Hiring workflowGreenhouse
Greenhouse
Workable
Core HRIS depthWorkable
Greenhouse
Workable

Which HR software is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

→ Greenhouse
Structured hiring kits/scorecards
Pick Greenhouse for Structured hiring kits/scorecards.
→ Greenhouse
Enterprise/mid TA teams
Pick Greenhouse for Enterprise/mid TA teams.
→ Workable
Published ATS floors + 15-day trial
Pick Workable for Published ATS floors + 15-day trial.
→ Workable
SMB recruiting with light HR
Pick Workable for SMB recruiting with light HR.
→ Greenhouse
Best for hiring workflow
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (10/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
→ Greenhouse
Best for integrations
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for integrations (9/10 vs 7/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

Starting pricing
Depends
Greenhouse
Greenhouse is custom quote (Core/Plus/Pro, no published seat $). Workable Standard is $299/mo annual for 1–20 employees.
Workable
Greenhouse is custom quote (Core/Plus/Pro, no published seat $). Workable Standard is $299/mo annual for 1–20 employees.
Hiring workflow
Greenhouse wins
Greenhouse
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (10/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Workable
Trails Greenhouse on this criterion
Core HRIS depth
Workable wins
Greenhouse
Trails Workable on this criterion
Workable
Workable is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (3/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Payroll processing
Workable wins
Greenhouse
Trails Workable on this criterion
Workable
Workable is the stronger fit for payroll processing (1/10 vs 3/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Scheduling depth
Tie
Greenhouse
Greenhouse and Workable are close on workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Workable
Greenhouse and Workable are close on workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Training depth
Workable wins
Greenhouse
Trails Workable on this criterion
Workable
Workable is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (2/10 vs 3/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

Which should you choose?

Choose Greenhouse if

Structured hiring kits/scorecards
Enterprise/mid TA teams

Choose Workable if

Published ATS floors + 15-day trial
SMB recruiting with light HR

Related comparisons

Alternatives to consider

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Greenhouse and Workable?

Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

Best HR software Compare another

Independent criterion outcomes
No invented scores or prices
Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.