SoftwareGlimpse

Ashby vs Greenhouse

Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring kits, scorecards, and governance (ATS cluster award). Choose Ashby when a modern AI-forward ATS with a published Foundations floor for ≤100 employees is the job. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare

Compare another

Ashby

7.9/10

Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.

Best for

• Startup/growth ATS + analytics
• Published $400 Foundations (≤100 employees)

Starting from $400.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

No universal winner

Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring kits, scorecards, and governance (ATS cluster award). Choose Ashby when a modern AI-forward ATS with a published Foundations floor for ≤100 employees is the job.

Ashby is better for

✓ Mobile / frontline

Greenhouse is better for

✓ Hiring workflow
✓ Core HRIS depth
✓ Training depth
✓ Time tracking depth

Tie

• Payroll processing
• Scheduling depth

Choose Ashby if: Startup/growth ATS + analytics

Choose Greenhouse if: Structured hiring kits and scorecards

See detailed comparison ↓

Greenhouse

8/10

Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.

Best for

• Structured hiring kits and scorecards
• Mid-market/enterprise TA governance

No free plan

Visit Greenhouse

Ashby vs Greenhouse at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

Starting pricingDepends
Ashby
Greenhouse
Free planDepends
Ashby
Greenhouse
User / licence minimumDepends
Ashby
Greenhouse
Hiring workflowGreenhouse
Ashby
Greenhouse
Core HRIS depthGreenhouse
Ashby
Greenhouse

Which HR software is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

→ Ashby
Startup/growth ATS + analytics
Pick Ashby for Startup/growth ATS + analytics.
→ Ashby
Published $400 Foundations (≤100 employees)
Pick Ashby for Published $400 Foundations (≤100 employees).
→ Greenhouse
Structured hiring kits and scorecards
Pick Greenhouse for Structured hiring kits and scorecards.
→ Greenhouse
Mid-market/enterprise TA governance
Pick Greenhouse for Mid-market/enterprise TA governance.
→ Ashby
Best for mobile / frontline
Ashby is the stronger fit for mobile and frontline use (6/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
→ Greenhouse
Best for hiring workflow
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (9/10 vs 10/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

Starting pricing
Depends
Ashby
Ashby Foundations is $400/mo for ≤100 employees (10% off annual). Greenhouse is custom quote (Core / Plus / Pro) with no published seat dollars.
Greenhouse
Ashby Foundations is $400/mo for ≤100 employees (10% off annual). Greenhouse is custom quote (Core / Plus / Pro) with no published seat dollars.
Hiring workflow
Greenhouse wins
Ashby
Trails Greenhouse on this criterion
Greenhouse
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (9/10 vs 10/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Core HRIS depth
Greenhouse wins
Ashby
Trails Greenhouse on this criterion
Greenhouse
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (2/10 vs 3/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Payroll processing
Tie
Ashby
Ashby and Greenhouse are close on payroll processing (1/10 vs 1/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Greenhouse
Ashby and Greenhouse are close on payroll processing (1/10 vs 1/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Scheduling depth
Tie
Ashby
Ashby and Greenhouse are close on workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Greenhouse
Ashby and Greenhouse are close on workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Training depth
Greenhouse wins
Ashby
Trails Greenhouse on this criterion
Greenhouse
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (1/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

Which should you choose?

Choose Ashby if

Startup/growth ATS + analytics
Published $400 Foundations (≤100 employees)

Choose Greenhouse if

Structured hiring kits and scorecards
Mid-market/enterprise TA governance

Related comparisons

Alternatives to consider

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Ashby and Greenhouse?

Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

Best HR software Compare another

Independent criterion outcomes
No invented scores or prices
Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.