Ashby vs Lever
Choose Ashby for a modern ATS+analytics platform with a published startup floor. Choose Lever for ATS+CRM under Employ when you prefer a demo-led quote over a $400/mo Foundations SKU. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.
Ashby
Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.
Best for
- • Published Foundations ATS
- • Native recruiting analytics
Starting from $400.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
Choose Ashby for a modern ATS+analytics platform with a published startup floor. Choose Lever for ATS+CRM under Employ when you prefer a demo-led quote over a $400/mo Foundations SKU.
Ashby is better for
- ✓ Mobile / frontline
Lever is better for
- ✓ Core HRIS depth
- ✓ Training depth
Tie
- • Hiring workflow
- • Payroll processing
- • Scheduling depth
Choose Ashby if: Published Foundations ATS
Choose Lever if: ATS + recruiting CRM
Lever
ATS + recruiting CRM under Employ — custom quote (Core AI-powered hiring platform plus Insights/VONQ/Onboarding add-ons); demo-led, no published seat $.
Best for
- • ATS + recruiting CRM
- • Employ-family packaging
No free plan
Ashby vs Lever at a glance
Criterion-level leaders from verified research.
Scorecard preview
Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.
- Starting pricingDepends
Ashby
Lever
- Free planDepends
Ashby
Lever
- User / licence minimumDepends
Ashby
Lever
- Hiring workflowTie
Ashby
Lever
- Core HRIS depthLever
Ashby
Lever
Which HR software is better for you?
Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.
- → Ashby
Published Foundations ATS
Pick Ashby for Published Foundations ATS.
- → Ashby
Native recruiting analytics
Pick Ashby for Native recruiting analytics.
- → Lever
ATS + recruiting CRM
Pick Lever for ATS + recruiting CRM.
- → Lever
Employ-family packaging
Pick Lever for Employ-family packaging.
- → Ashby
Best for mobile / frontline
Ashby is the stronger fit for mobile and frontline use (6/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
- → Lever
Best for core hris depth
Lever is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (2/10 vs 3/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
The biggest differences
Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.
Starting pricing
DependsAshby
Ashby Foundations $400/mo (≤100 employees). Lever is custom quote with no published USD floor.
Lever
Ashby Foundations $400/mo (≤100 employees). Lever is custom quote with no published USD floor.
Hiring workflow
TieAshby
Ashby and Lever are close on hiring workflow (9/10 vs 9/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Lever
Ashby and Lever are close on hiring workflow (9/10 vs 9/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Core HRIS depth
Lever winsAshby
Trails Lever on this criterion
Lever
Lever is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (2/10 vs 3/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Payroll processing
TieAshby
Ashby and Lever are close on payroll processing (1/10 vs 1/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Lever
Ashby and Lever are close on payroll processing (1/10 vs 1/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Scheduling depth
TieAshby
Ashby and Lever are close on workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Lever
Ashby and Lever are close on workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Training depth
Lever winsAshby
Trails Lever on this criterion
Lever
Lever is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (1/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Which should you choose?
Choose Ashby if
- Published Foundations ATS
- Native recruiting analytics
Choose Lever if
- ATS + recruiting CRM
- Employ-family packaging
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider
Greenhouse
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
Workable
Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.
Breezy HR
Mid-market ATS with free Bootstrap, paid Startup/Growth/Business pools, career site, and interview workflows — Growth from $273/mo annual.
How we compare
A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology
1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.
Still deciding between Ashby and Lever?
Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.