SoftwareGlimpse

Asana vs Wrike

Compare Asana and Wrike on starting price, seat minimums, free plans, timelines, automations, integrations, and reporting. There is no universal winner — choose by job-cluster fit.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20264 evidence sources5 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Asana logo

Asana

8.3/10

Cross-functional work management with goals, workflows and AI Studio — Starter from $10.99/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Cross-functional ease
  • Goals-driven work

Starting from $10.99/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

Overall tie

Overall tie. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Asana is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Collaboration
  • AI features

Wrike is better for

  • Reporting
  • Scalability

Tie

  • Free plan
  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Automations

Choose Asana if: Cross-functional ease

Choose Wrike if: Agency proofing/intake

See detailed comparison ↓
Wrike logo

Wrike

8.1/10

Enterprise/agency work management with proofing, intake and resourcing — Team from $10/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Agency proofing/intake
  • Enterprise delivery reporting

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Asana and Wrike. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    Depends

    Asana Starter $10.99/user/mo annual; Wrike Team $10/user/mo annual — similar entry; Wrike Business jumps to $25.

    AsanaDepends
    WrikeDepends
  • Seat / licence minimum

    Minimum billed seats and how that changes small-team cost.

    Depends

    Both per-user; Wrike Team often suits smaller collaborative teams before Business governance.

    AsanaDepends
    WrikeDepends
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Tie

    Asana and Wrike both research a free plan. Confirm what each path unlocks on the live vendor pricing page.

    AsanaTie
    WrikeTie
  • Timeline / Gantt

    Native timeline, Gantt, or dependency planning.

    Tie

    Asana and Wrike have the same researched availability on timeline gantt (Asana: supported; Wrike: supported).

    Asana9/10
    Wrike9/10
  • Automations

    Rules, recipes, and workflow automations in the work OS.

    Tie

    Asana and Wrike have the same researched availability on automations workflows (Asana: supported; Wrike: supported).

    Asana8/10
    Wrike8/10
  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Asana

    Asana leads on ease of use (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Asana9/10
    Wrike7/10
  • Work planning depth

    Boards, timelines, dependencies, and planning views for the primary job.

    Tie

    Asana and Wrike are close on work planning depth (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Asana9/10
    Wrike9/10
  • Automation & workflows

    Automation depth, workflow builders, and action limits.

    Tie

    Asana and Wrike are close on automation & workflows (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Asana8/10
    Wrike8/10
  • Collaboration

    Docs, comments, chat, proofing, and guest collaboration quality.

    Asana

    Asana leads on collaboration (9/10 vs 8/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Asana9/10
    Wrike8/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Asana and Wrike are close on integrations (8/10 vs 8/10) from vendor documentation as of the research date — not lab testing.

    Asana8/10
    Wrike8/10
  • AI features

    Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.

    Asana

    Asana leads on ai features (8/10 vs 7/10) from vendor documentation as of the research date — not lab testing.

    Asana8/10
    Wrike7/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Wrike

    Wrike leads on reporting (8/10 vs 9/10) from vendor documentation as of the research date — not lab testing.

    Asana8/10
    Wrike9/10
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    Wrike

    Wrike leads on scalability (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Asana8/10
    Wrike9/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Tie

    Asana and Wrike are close on value for money (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Asana7/10
    Wrike7/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.