Adapt.io vs Clay
Compare Adapt.io and Clay on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Adapt.io
Regional B2B contact database with credit plans — Free; Starter $49/mo; Basic $99/mo; Custom contact sales; 7-day trial.
Best for
- • SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
- • Buyers who prefer credit (not seat) packaging and Chrome-led email finding
- • Teams exporting contacts into CRM or SEP tools rather than sequencing in-app
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Adapt.io and Clay. Choose Adapt.io when SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans. Choose Clay when GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Adapt.io is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Value for money
Clay is better for
- ✓ Contact data
- ✓ Prospecting
- ✓ Email outreach
- ✓ Integrations
Choose Adapt.io if: SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
Choose Clay if: GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
Clay
GTM data enrichment and workflow platform for multi-provider waterfall prospecting — Free + Launch from ~$167/mo headline, Growth, Enterprise.
Best for
- • GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
- • Growth teams that want Claygent-style AI research inside prospecting workflows
- • Buyers consolidating many data vendors into one orchestration layer
Starting from $167.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Pros & cons
A balanced look at where each product shines — and where it falls short.
Adapt.io
Strengths in greenPros
- Stronger on ease of use
- Stronger on value for money
Cons
- Trails on contact data
- Trails on prospecting
- Trails on email outreach
Best for
SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
Clay
Trade-offs in redPros
- Stronger on contact data
- Stronger on prospecting
- Stronger on email outreach
- Stronger on integrations
Cons
- Trails on ease of use
- Trails on value for money
Best for
GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
Choose if…
Choose Adapt.io if
- SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
- Buyers who prefer credit (not seat) packaging and Chrome-led email finding
- Teams exporting contacts into CRM or SEP tools rather than sequencing in-app
Choose Clay if
- GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
- Growth teams that want Claygent-style AI research inside prospecting workflows
- Buyers consolidating many data vendors into one orchestration layer
Still unsure which fits?
Answer a few buyer questions and get a shortlist matched to your priorities.
Best sales intelligence softwareSome visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.