ACT! vs Podio
Compare ACT! and Podio on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
ACT!
ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).
Best for
- • ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
- • Classic SMB CRM for managing contacts, activities, and sales follow-ups — especially familiar to established small businesses.
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between ACT! and Podio. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.
ACT! is better for
- ✓ Pipeline management
- ✓ Email capabilities
- ✓ Administration
Podio is better for
- ✓ Sales automation
- ✓ Reporting
- ✓ Customization
- ✓ Integrations
Tie
- • Ease of use
Choose ACT! if: ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
Choose Podio if: Flexible work platform often used as a customizable CRM, with Free (5 users), Plus, and Premium plans
Podio
Customizable work platform used as CRM; Free (5 users), Plus from $11.20/user/mo annual.
Best for
- • Flexible work platform often used as a customizable CRM, with Free (5 users), Plus, and Premium plans
- • Customizable work platform where teams build CRM-like apps, projects, and workflows without rigid CRM lock-in.
Starting from $11.20/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
8
Criteria
10
Screenshots
4
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| ACT! Pricing | ACT! | official-pricing-page |
| ACT! | ACT! | official-product-page |
| ACT! Pricing (fixture snapshot) | ACT! | fixture |
| ACT! Product (fixture snapshot) | ACT! | fixture |
| Podio Pricing | Podio | official-pricing-page |
| Podio | Podio | official-product-page |
| Podio Pricing (fixture snapshot) | Podio | fixture |
| Podio Product (fixture snapshot) | Podio | fixture |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.