SoftwareGlimpse

ACT! vs Copper

Compare ACT! and Copper on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20266 evidence sources14 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
ACT! logo

ACT!

5.6/10

ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).

Best for

  • ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
  • Classic SMB CRM for managing contacts, activities, and sales follow-ups — especially familiar to established small businesses.

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between ACT! and Copper. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Copper is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Pipeline management
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities

Choose ACT! if: ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales

Choose Copper if: Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations

See detailed comparison ↓
Copper logo

Copper

7.2/10

Google Workspace-native CRM for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.

Best for

  • Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations
  • Copper is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool
  • Copper is a Google Workspace-native CRM built for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.

Starting from $23.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for ACT! and Copper. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Copper

    Copper leads on ease of use (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!6/10
    Copper8/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    Copper

    Copper leads on pipeline management (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!6/10
    Copper8/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    Copper

    Copper leads on sales automation (5/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!5/10
    Copper7/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    Copper

    Copper leads on email capabilities (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!6/10
    Copper8/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Copper

    Copper leads on reporting (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!5/10
    Copper6/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    Copper

    Stronger custom pipelines availability

    ACT!6/10
    Copper6/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Copper

    Copper leads on integrations (5/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!5/10
    Copper8/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    Copper

    Copper leads on administration (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!Weaker
    CopperStronger
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    Copper

    Copper leads on scalability (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!5/10
    Copper6/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Copper

    Copper leads on value for money (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    ACT!6/10
    Copper7/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.