SoftwareGlimpse

ACT! vs Copper

Compare ACT! and Copper on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20266 evidence sources14 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
ACT! logo

ACT!

5.6/10

ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).

Best for

  • ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
  • Classic SMB CRM for managing contacts, activities, and sales follow-ups — especially familiar to established small businesses.

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between ACT! and Copper. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Copper is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Pipeline management
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities

Choose ACT! if: ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales

Choose Copper if: Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations

See detailed comparison ↓
Copper logo

Copper

7.2/10

Google Workspace-native CRM for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.

Best for

  • Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations
  • Copper is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool
  • Copper is a Google Workspace-native CRM built for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.

Starting from $23.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

6

Criteria

10

Screenshots

14

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
ACT! PricingACT!official-pricing-page
ACT!ACT!official-product-page
ACT! Pricing (fixture snapshot)ACT!fixture
ACT! Product (fixture snapshot)ACT!fixture
Copper PricingCopperofficial-pricing-page
Copper CRMCopperofficial-product-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.