SoftwareGlimpse

ACT! vs Attio

Compare ACT! and Attio on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20266 evidence sources14 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
ACT! logo

ACT!

5.6/10

ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).

Best for

  • ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
  • Classic SMB CRM for managing contacts, activities, and sales follow-ups — especially familiar to established small businesses.

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between ACT! and Attio. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Attio is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Pipeline management
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities

Choose ACT! if: ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales

Choose Attio if: Free tier for small startup teams

See detailed comparison ↓
Attio logo

Attio

7.6/10

Modern, flexible CRM for startups and GTM teams with a data-model-first workspace and AI assistance.

Best for

  • Free tier for small startup teams
  • Startup/SMB GTM fit with Free/Plus
  • Attio is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool

Starting from $0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

6

Criteria

10

Screenshots

14

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
ACT! PricingACT!official-pricing-page
ACT!ACT!official-product-page
ACT! Pricing (fixture snapshot)ACT!fixture
ACT! Product (fixture snapshot)ACT!fixture
Attio PricingAttioofficial-pricing-page
AttioAttioofficial-product-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.