SoftwareGlimpse

Rootly vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compare Rootly and SolarWinds Incident Response on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20267 evidence sources3 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Rootly logo

Rootly

7.7/10

Incident response — Incident Response Essentials $20/user/mo; On-Call Essentials $20/user; Enterprise custom. Does not outrank PagerDuty 8.0.

Best for

  • Slack-first teams buying incident command at a published $20/user floor
  • Buyers who will add On-Call Essentials only if they need paging
  • Comparisons versus FireHydrant Pro $25 and incident.io Team $15

Starting from $20.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Rootly and SolarWinds Incident Response. Choose Rootly when Slack-first teams buying incident command at a published $20/user floor. Choose SolarWinds Incident Response when Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

SolarWinds Incident Response is better for

  • Starting pricing

Tie

  • Integrations
  • Security & admin

Choose Rootly if: Slack-first teams buying incident command at a published $20/user floor

Choose SolarWinds Incident Response if: Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor

See detailed comparison ↓
SolarWinds Incident Response logo

SolarWinds Incident Response

7.7/10

SolarWinds Incident Response (formerly Squadcast) — Pro $15/user/mo annual; Premium $24/user/mo annual; Enterprise contact; 14-day trial. Slug remains squadcast. Does not outrank PagerDuty 8.0.

Best for

  • Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor
  • Buyers comparing SolarWinds Incident Response (Squadcast) to incident.io, FireHydrant, and Rootly
  • Orgs that will spend the 14-day trial before committing

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Rootly and SolarWinds Incident Response. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    SolarWinds Incident Response

    SolarWinds Incident Response publishes a lower researched starting floor ($15/mo vs $20/mo for Rootly). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

    RootlyWeaker
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseStronger
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Depends

    Rootly does not research a free plan; SolarWinds Incident Response does not research a free plan.

    RootlyDepends
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseDepends
  • User / licence minimum

    Seat floors, per-employee minimums, and small-team pricing traps.

    Depends

    Check seat, agent, or licence minimums for Rootly and SolarWinds Incident Response on current vendor packaging.

    RootlyDepends
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseDepends
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Rootly and SolarWinds Incident Response are close on integrations (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Rootly8/10
    SolarWinds Incident Response8/10
  • Security & admin

    Admin controls, access, compliance posture, and security packaging.

    Tie

    Rootly and SolarWinds Incident Response are close on security admin (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    RootlyTie
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseTie

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.