SoftwareGlimpse

Microsoft Project vs Motion

Compare Microsoft Project and Motion on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources4 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

7.4/10

Microsoft 365 project / Planner ladder for Gantt, resources and portfolios — Planner Plan 1 from ~$10/user/mo.

Best for

  • Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
  • Traditional PMO Gantt/resource needs
  • Enterprise portfolio planning on higher plans

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Microsoft Project and Motion. Choose Microsoft Project when Microsoft 365 standardised orgs. Choose Motion when Individuals/small teams buying AI auto-scheduling. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Microsoft Project is better for

  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Collaboration
  • Integrations
  • Reporting

Motion is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Automations
  • AI features

Choose Microsoft Project if: Microsoft 365 standardised orgs

Choose Motion if: Individuals/small teams buying AI auto-scheduling

See detailed comparison ↓
Motion logo

Motion

6.9/10

AI calendar + task auto-scheduling (projects, docs, meetings) — Pro AI from $19/seat/mo annual.

Best for

  • Individuals/small teams buying AI auto-scheduling
  • Calendar + task unification
  • Buyers who want AI docs/projects bundled

Starting from $19.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Microsoft Project and Motion. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    Depends

    Microsoft Project researched starting price from $10/mo; Motion researched starting price from $19/mo. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

    Microsoft ProjectDepends
    MotionDepends
  • Seat / licence minimum

    Minimum billed seats and how that changes small-team cost.

    Depends

    Check paid seat floors for Microsoft Project and Motion on current vendor packaging.

    Microsoft ProjectDepends
    MotionDepends
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Depends

    Microsoft Project does not research a free plan; Motion does not research a free plan.

    Microsoft ProjectDepends
    MotionDepends
  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Motion

    Motion leads on ease of use (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Project6/10
    Motion8/10
  • Timeline / Gantt

    Native timeline, Gantt, or dependency planning.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Project9/10
    Motion7/10
  • Automations

    Rules, recipes, and workflow automations in the work OS.

    Motion

    Motion leads on automations (6/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Project6/10
    Motion9/10
  • Collaboration

    Docs, comments, chat, proofing, and guest collaboration quality.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on collaboration (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Project7/10
    Motion6/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on integrations (9/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Project9/10
    Motion6/10
  • AI features

    Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.

    Motion

    Motion leads on ai features (6/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Project6/10
    Motion9/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on reporting (8/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Project8/10
    Motion5/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project has the lower researched starting floor ($10/mo vs $19/mo for Motion) while editorial value scores are close. Confirm renewals and seat math.

    Microsoft Project6/10
    Motion6/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.