SoftwareGlimpse

Lusha vs Ocean.io

Compare Lusha and Ocean.io on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 202610 evidence sources15 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Lusha logo

Lusha

5.6/10

B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.

Best for

  • SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment
  • RevOps cleaning CRM records and automating enrichment
  • Teams already standardized on Salesforce/HubSpot/Pipedrive

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Lusha and Ocean.io. Choose Lusha when SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment. Choose Ocean.io when GTM teams whose primary job is finding lookalike / similar companies to best customers. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Lusha is better for

  • Contact data
  • Email outreach
  • Integrations

Ocean.io is better for

  • Prospecting
  • Value for money

Tie

  • Ease of use

Choose Lusha if: SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment

Choose Ocean.io if: GTM teams whose primary job is finding lookalike / similar companies to best customers

See detailed comparison ↓
Ocean.io logo

Ocean.io

6.4/10

Lookalike / similar-company prospecting with credit waterfall enrichment — from ~$0.063/credit, ~$47/mo yearly headline.

Best for

  • GTM teams whose primary job is finding lookalike / similar companies to best customers
  • Buyers comparing Ocean to Clay-style creative prospecting when lookalike matching is the bottleneck
  • Teams willing to model credit minimums (~9k) and yearly packaging

Starting from $47.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Lusha and Ocean.io. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Tie

    Lusha and Ocean.io are close on ease of use (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Lusha7/10
    Ocean.io7/10
  • Contact data

    Coverage and quality of contact data.

    Lusha

    Stronger contact data availability

    LushaStronger
    Ocean.ioWeaker
  • Prospecting

    Prospecting workflow strength.

    Ocean.io

    Ocean.io leads on prospecting (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    LushaWeaker
    Ocean.ioStronger
  • Email outreach

    Outreach sequencing and deliverability tooling.

    Lusha

    Lusha leads on email outreach (6/10 vs 2/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    LushaStronger
    Ocean.ioWeaker
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Lusha

    Stronger crm sync availability

    LushaStronger
    Ocean.ioWeaker
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Ocean.io

    Ocean.io leads on value for money (5/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Lusha5/10
    Ocean.io7/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.