SoftwareGlimpse

HubSpot vs SugarCRM

Compare HubSpot and SugarCRM on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20269 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
HubSpot logo

HubSpot

7.8/10

CRM platform with free core CRM plus Sales, Marketing, Service, and Content Hubs for growing teams.

Best for

  • Free CRM + Starter Customer Platform seats fit early teams; hub complexity is optional
  • Professional/Enterprise hubs and suite breadth scale with multi-team GTM
  • SSO, custom objects, field-level permissions, and Enterprise hub seats are documented

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between HubSpot and SugarCRM. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

HubSpot is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities
  • Reporting

Tie

  • Pipeline management
  • Customization

Choose HubSpot if: Free CRM + Starter Customer Platform seats fit early teams; hub complexity is optional

Choose SugarCRM if: SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs

See detailed comparison ↓
SugarCRM logo

SugarCRM

7.1/10

Customer experience CRM (Sugar Sell) with Standard through Premier editions and Sugar Intelligence AI.

Best for

  • SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs
  • SugarCRM competes in enterprise/mid-market CRM evaluations
  • Sales/CX CRM focus

Starting from $59.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for HubSpot and SugarCRM. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    HubSpot

    HubSpot leads on ease of use (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HubSpot7/10
    SugarCRM6/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    Tie

    HubSpot and SugarCRM are close on pipeline management (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HubSpot8/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    HubSpot

    HubSpot leads on sales automation (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HubSpot8/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    HubSpot

    HubSpot leads on email capabilities (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HubSpot8/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    HubSpot

    HubSpot leads on reporting (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HubSpot8/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    Tie

    HubSpot and SugarCRM are close on customization (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HubSpot8/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    HubSpot

    HubSpot leads on integrations (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HubSpot9/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    HubSpot

    Stronger coverage across sso, custom fields, custom objects, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (5/10 vs 5/10).

    HubSpotStronger
    SugarCRMWeaker
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    HubSpot

    HubSpot leads on scalability (9/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HubSpot9/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    HubSpot

    Better for value for money

    HubSpot8/10
    SugarCRM8/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.