SoftwareGlimpse

Hive vs Wrike

Compare Hive and Wrike on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources5 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Hive logo

Hive

7.6/10

Work management platform with free plan (≤10 members) and Teams from $12/user/mo annual — strong monday.com peer.

Best for

  • SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday
  • Teams that can start on Free (≤10) before upgrading to Teams
  • Buyers comparing monday.com as a primary Work OS peer

Starting from $5.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Hive and Wrike. Choose Hive when SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday. Choose Wrike when Agencies with proofing/intake. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Hive is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Value for money

Wrike is better for

  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Integrations
  • Reporting

Tie

  • Free plan
  • Automations
  • Collaboration

Choose Hive if: SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday

Choose Wrike if: Agencies with proofing/intake

See detailed comparison ↓
Wrike logo

Wrike

8.1/10

Enterprise/agency work management with proofing, intake and resourcing — Team from $10/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Agencies with proofing/intake
  • Mid-market/enterprise cross-functional delivery
  • Teams needing resource visibility

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

11

Screenshots

5

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Hive — Official SiteHiveofficial-product-page
Hive PricingHiveofficial-pricing-page
Wrike — Official SiteWrikeofficial-product-page
Wrike PricingWrikeofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.