SoftwareGlimpse

8x8 vs Five9

Compare 8x8 and Five9 on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources8 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
8x8 logo

8x8

8.6/10

Global UCaaS + contact-centre platform (8x8 Work / X Series) — Work X2 research floor ~$24/user/month annual; CC tiers custom/higher.

Best for

  • Mid-market and enterprise teams needing global UCaaS with a contact-centre path
  • Organisations shortlisting RingCentral-class peers for multi-country voice + meetings + chat
  • Buyers who want analytics/quality management inside the communications platform

Starting from $24.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

8x8 is better for

  • Routing & IVR
  • Analytics

Five9 is better for

  • Power dialer

Tie

  • Number / country coverage
  • WhatsApp Business
  • CRM / CTI integrations

Choose 8x8 if: Mid-market and enterprise teams needing global UCaaS with a contact-centre path

Choose Five9 if: Mid-market and enterprise contact centres that need blended dialer strength

See detailed comparison ↓
Five9 logo

Five9

8.2/10

Cloud contact center (CCaaS) — Digital from $119/concurrent seat/mo; Core $159; Plus/Pro/Enterprise quote — 50-seat minimum.

Best for

  • Mid-market and enterprise contact centres that need blended dialer strength
  • Teams comfortable with concurrent-seat economics and 50+ seat minimums
  • Buyers who want CRM/UC adapter choice inside CCaaS

Starting from $119.00/user/mo

No free plan

Screenshots

Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.

8x8

Five9

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.