Close vs Copper
Compare Close and Copper on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Close
Sales-focused CRM for pipeline management and sales engagement workflows.
Best for
- • Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM
- • Teams that need dialing power and advanced outreach workflows
- • Teams that rely on calling, email, and SMS from the CRM
Starting from $9.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Close and Copper. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.
Close is better for
- ✓ Sales automation
- ✓ Email capabilities
- ✓ Reporting
- ✓ Customization
Copper is better for
- ✓ Pipeline management
- ✓ Integrations
- ✓ Administration
Tie
- • Ease of use
Choose Close if: Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM
Choose Copper if: Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations
Copper
Google Workspace-native CRM for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.
Best for
- • Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations
- • Copper is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool
- • Copper is a Google Workspace-native CRM built for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.
Starting from $23.00/user/mo
No free plan
Comparison scorecard
Criterion-by-criterion results for Close and Copper. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.
- Tie
Ease of use
How quickly teams become productive.
Close and Copper are close on ease of use (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Close8/10Copper8/10 - Copper
Pipeline management
Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.
Stronger coverage across pipeline management, deal management, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).
Close8/10Copper8/10 - Close
Sales automation
Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.
Close leads on sales automation (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Close8/10Copper7/10 - Close
Email capabilities
Native email workflows and tracking.
Stronger coverage across email sync, email tracking, email sequences, call functionality. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).
Close8/10Copper8/10 - Close
Reporting
Reporting and forecasting quality.
Close leads on reporting (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Close7/10Copper6/10 - Close
Customization
Fields, workflows, and configurability.
Close leads on customization (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Close7/10Copper6/10 - Copper
Integrations
Important third-party integrations.
Copper leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Close7/10Copper8/10 - Copper
Administration
Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.
Copper leads on administration (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
CloseWeakerCopperStronger - Close
Scalability
Fit as team size and complexity grow.
Close leads on scalability (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Close8/10Copper6/10 - Depends
Value for money
Capability relative to total cost of ownership.
Close researched starting price $9/user/mo vs Copper $23/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.
Close6/10Copper7/10
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.