Clay vs Gong
Compare Clay and Gong on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Clay
GTM data enrichment and workflow platform for multi-provider waterfall prospecting — Free + Launch from ~$167/mo headline, Growth, Enterprise.
Best for
- • GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
- • Growth teams that want Claygent-style AI research inside prospecting workflows
- • Buyers consolidating many data vendors into one orchestration layer
Starting from $167.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Clay and Gong. Choose Clay when GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls. Choose Gong when Revenue teams whose primary job is conversation intelligence and deal coaching. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Clay is better for
- ✓ Contact data
- ✓ Prospecting
- ✓ Email outreach
- ✓ Value for money
Gong is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Integrations
Choose Clay if: GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
Choose Gong if: Revenue teams whose primary job is conversation intelligence and deal coaching
Gong
Conversation intelligence / revenue AI — per-user licenses + platform fee; custom proposal only (no public dollar list).
Best for
- • Revenue teams whose primary job is conversation intelligence and deal coaching
- • Orgs layering Gong beside CRM + SEP (Outreach/Salesloft)
- • Buyers who need call/meeting insight — not contact discovery
No free plan
Screenshots
Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.
Clay
Gong
No screenshots in this filter.
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.