Clay vs Gong
Compare Clay and Gong on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Clay
GTM data enrichment and workflow platform for multi-provider waterfall prospecting — Free + Launch from ~$167/mo headline, Growth, Enterprise.
Best for
- • GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
- • Growth teams that want Claygent-style AI research inside prospecting workflows
- • Buyers consolidating many data vendors into one orchestration layer
Starting from $167.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Clay and Gong. Choose Clay when GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls. Choose Gong when Revenue teams whose primary job is conversation intelligence and deal coaching. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Clay is better for
- ✓ Contact data
- ✓ Prospecting
- ✓ Email outreach
- ✓ Value for money
Gong is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Integrations
Choose Clay if: GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
Choose Gong if: Revenue teams whose primary job is conversation intelligence and deal coaching
Gong
Conversation intelligence / revenue AI — per-user licenses + platform fee; custom proposal only (no public dollar list).
Best for
- • Revenue teams whose primary job is conversation intelligence and deal coaching
- • Orgs layering Gong beside CRM + SEP (Outreach/Salesloft)
- • Buyers who need call/meeting insight — not contact discovery
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
10
Criteria
6
Screenshots
5
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Clay — Official Site | Clay | official-product-page |
| Clay Pricing | Clay | official-pricing-page |
| Clay Product | Clay | official-product-page |
| Claygent | Clay | official-product-page |
| Clay Integrations | Clay | official-product-page |
| Clay Pricing | Clay | official-product-page |
| Gong — Official Site | Gong | official-product-page |
| Gong Pricing | Gong | official-pricing-page |
| Gong Product | Gong | official-product-page |
| Gong Pricing | Gong | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.