SoftwareGlimpse

Asana vs Jira

Compare Asana and Jira on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources4 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Asana logo

Asana

8.3/10

Cross-functional work management with goals, workflows and AI Studio — Starter from $10.99/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Cross-functional marketing/ops teams
  • Buyers prioritising adoption ease and goals/workflows
  • Mid-market work management shortlists

Starting from $10.99/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Asana and Jira. Choose Asana when Cross-functional marketing/ops teams. Choose Jira when Software engineering / Agile teams. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Asana is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Collaboration
  • AI features

Jira is better for

  • Integrations
  • Value for money

Tie

  • Free plan
  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Automations

Choose Asana if: Cross-functional marketing/ops teams

Choose Jira if: Software engineering / Agile teams

See detailed comparison ↓
Jira logo

Jira

7.7/10

Atlassian Agile issue tracker for software teams — Free ≤10; Standard from ~$8.15/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Software engineering / Agile teams
  • Orgs already on Atlassian
  • Regulated/enterprise software delivery

Starting from $8.15/user/mo

Free plan available

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

11

Screenshots

4

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Asana — Official SiteAsanaofficial-product-page
Asana PricingAsanaofficial-pricing-page
Jira — Official SiteJiraofficial-product-page
Jira PricingJiraofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.