Agile CRM vs folk
Compare Agile CRM and folk on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Agile CRM
Freemium all-in-one CRM; Free (10 users), Starter from ~$8.99/user/mo on multi-year headline pricing.
Best for
- • All-in-one CRM with a free tier (10 users) and Starter/Regular/Enterprise plans for sales, marketing, and service
- • Affordable all-in-one CRM combining sales, marketing automation, and service for growing teams.
Starting from $8.99/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Agile CRM and folk. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.
Agile CRM is better for
- ✓ Pipeline management
- ✓ Reporting
folk is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Email capabilities
- ✓ Customization
- ✓ Integrations
Tie
- • Sales automation
- • Scalability
Choose Agile CRM if: All-in-one CRM with a free tier (10 users) and Starter/Regular/Enterprise plans for sales, marketing, and service
Choose folk if: Standard/Premium fit collaborative SMB relationship selling
folk
Simple relationship CRM for organizing contacts and collaborative outreach.
Best for
- • Standard/Premium fit collaborative SMB relationship selling
- • Relationship CRM + LinkedIn capture fits founders and small teams
- • Pipelines, sequences, and AI assistants support sales workflows
Starting from $24.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
8
Criteria
10
Screenshots
16
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Agile CRM Pricing | Agile CRM | official-pricing-page |
| Agile CRM | Agile CRM | official-product-page |
| Agile CRM Pricing (fixture snapshot) | Agile CRM | fixture |
| Agile CRM Product (fixture snapshot) | Agile CRM | fixture |
| folk Pricing (fixture snapshot) | folk | fixture |
| folk Product (fixture snapshot) | folk | fixture |
| folk Pricing | folk | official-pricing-page |
| folk CRM | folk | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.