ACT! vs Agile CRM
Compare ACT! and Agile CRM on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
ACT!
ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).
Best for
- • ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
- • Classic SMB CRM for managing contacts, activities, and sales follow-ups — especially familiar to established small businesses.
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between ACT! and Agile CRM. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.
Agile CRM is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Pipeline management
- ✓ Sales automation
- ✓ Email capabilities
Choose ACT! if: ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
Choose Agile CRM if: All-in-one CRM with a free tier (10 users) and Starter/Regular/Enterprise plans for sales, marketing, and service
Agile CRM
Freemium all-in-one CRM; Free (10 users), Starter from ~$8.99/user/mo on multi-year headline pricing.
Best for
- • All-in-one CRM with a free tier (10 users) and Starter/Regular/Enterprise plans for sales, marketing, and service
- • Affordable all-in-one CRM combining sales, marketing automation, and service for growing teams.
Starting from $8.99/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
8
Criteria
10
Screenshots
4
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| ACT! Pricing | ACT! | official-pricing-page |
| ACT! | ACT! | official-product-page |
| ACT! Pricing (fixture snapshot) | ACT! | fixture |
| ACT! Product (fixture snapshot) | ACT! | fixture |
| Agile CRM Pricing | Agile CRM | official-pricing-page |
| Agile CRM | Agile CRM | official-product-page |
| Agile CRM Pricing (fixture snapshot) | Agile CRM | fixture |
| Agile CRM Product (fixture snapshot) | Agile CRM | fixture |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.