SoftwareGlimpse

Pipedrive vs SugarCRM

Compare Pipedrive and SugarCRM on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 202611 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Pipedrive logo

Pipedrive

7.5/10

Pipeline-first sales CRM for visual deal management, activity-based selling, and growing sales teams.

Best for

  • Pipeline UX and seat pricing fit SMB sales teams
  • Lite works for solo pipeline tracking; Growth for email/automation
  • Sales-first CRM rather than service/marketing suite

Starting from $14.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Pipedrive and SugarCRM. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Pipedrive is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Pipeline management
  • Email capabilities
  • Integrations

SugarCRM is better for

  • Sales automation
  • Reporting
  • Scalability

Tie

  • Customization

Choose Pipedrive if: Pipeline UX and seat pricing fit SMB sales teams

Choose SugarCRM if: SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs

See detailed comparison ↓
SugarCRM logo

SugarCRM

7.1/10

Customer experience CRM (Sugar Sell) with Standard through Premier editions and Sugar Intelligence AI.

Best for

  • SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs
  • SugarCRM competes in enterprise/mid-market CRM evaluations
  • Sales/CX CRM focus

Starting from $59.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Pipedrive and SugarCRM. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Pipedrive

    Pipedrive leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Pipedrive8/10
    SugarCRM6/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    Pipedrive

    Pipedrive leads on pipeline management (9/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Pipedrive9/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    SugarCRM

    Stronger workflow automation availability

    Pipedrive7/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    Pipedrive

    Stronger email sync availability

    Pipedrive7/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    SugarCRM

    Stronger forecasting availability

    Pipedrive7/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    Tie

    Pipedrive and SugarCRM are close on customization (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Pipedrive8/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Pipedrive

    Pipedrive leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Pipedrive8/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    Pipedrive

    Pipedrive leads on administration (7/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    PipedriveStronger
    SugarCRMWeaker
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    SugarCRM

    SugarCRM leads on scalability (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Pipedrive7/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Depends

    Pipedrive researched starting price $14/user/mo vs SugarCRM $59/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

    Pipedrive7/10
    SugarCRM8/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.