Lever vs Paylocity
Compare Lever and Paylocity on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Lever
ATS + recruiting CRM under Employ — custom quote (Core AI-powered hiring platform plus Insights/VONQ/Onboarding add-ons); demo-led, no published seat $.
Best for
- • Mid-market talent teams that want ATS and recruiting CRM together
- • Orgs already comparing Greenhouse / Lever / Ashby as the dedicated ATS shortlist
- • Teams that will take a demo rather than a self-serve ATS trial
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Tie
- • Integrations
Choose Lever if: Mid-market talent teams that want ATS and recruiting CRM together
Choose Paylocity if: US mid-market companies (roughly 100–1,000 employees) that want payroll+HR in one modern platform
Paylocity
US mid-market HR + payroll (+ finance/IT) — custom quote (‘Explore Payroll Pricing’); Ignite AI. Landscape vs Gusto.
Best for
- • US mid-market companies (roughly 100–1,000 employees) that want payroll+HR in one modern platform
- • Teams comparing Paylocity vs ADP Workforce Now vs Paycor
- • Orgs that may add finance/IT and Ignite AI later
No free plan
Lever vs Paylocity at a glance
Criterion-level leaders from verified research.
Scorecard preview
Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.
- Starting pricingDepends
Lever
Paylocity
- Free planDepends
Lever
Paylocity
- User / licence minimumDepends
Lever
Paylocity
- IntegrationsTie
Lever
Paylocity
The biggest differences
Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.
Starting pricing
DependsLever
Lever starting price was not verified in current research — confirm on the vendor pricing page; Paylocity starting price was not verified in current research — confirm on the vendor pricing page. Better value depends on plan rungs, currency, and add-ons.
Paylocity
Lever starting price was not verified in current research — confirm on the vendor pricing page; Paylocity starting price was not verified in current research — confirm on the vendor pricing page. Better value depends on plan rungs, currency, and add-ons.
Which should you choose?
Choose Lever if
- Mid-market talent teams that want ATS and recruiting CRM together
- Orgs already comparing Greenhouse / Lever / Ashby as the dedicated ATS shortlist
- Teams that will take a demo rather than a self-serve ATS trial
Choose Paylocity if
- US mid-market companies (roughly 100–1,000 employees) that want payroll+HR in one modern platform
- Teams comparing Paylocity vs ADP Workforce Now vs Paycor
- Orgs that may add finance/IT and Ignite AI later
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider
Greenhouse
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
Ashby
Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.
Workable
Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.
Gusto
US SMB payroll + benefits + light HR — Simple from $49/mo + $6/person; Plus $80 + $12; Premium $180 + $22.
How we compare
A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology
1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.
Still deciding between Lever and Paylocity?
Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.