SoftwareGlimpse

Jira vs monday.com

Compare Jira and monday.com on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources4 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Jira logo

Jira

7.7/10

Atlassian Agile issue tracker for software teams — Free ≤10; Standard from ~$8.15/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Software engineering / Agile teams
  • Orgs already on Atlassian
  • Regulated/enterprise software delivery

Starting from $8.15/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Jira and monday.com. Choose Jira when Software engineering / Agile teams. Choose monday.com when Teams standardising on one Work OS for projects, ops and cross-functional work. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Jira is better for

  • Value for money

monday.com is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Automations
  • Collaboration
  • AI features

Tie

  • Free plan
  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Integrations

Choose Jira if: Software engineering / Agile teams

Choose monday.com if: Teams standardising on one Work OS for projects, ops and cross-functional work

See detailed comparison ↓
monday.com logo

monday.com

8.6/10

Work OS / work management platform with boards, timelines, automations and AI credits — Basic from $9/seat/mo annual (3-seat minimum).

Best for

  • Teams standardising on one Work OS for projects, ops and cross-functional work
  • Buyers who need boards + timeline + automations with mainstream brand recognition
  • Mid-market orgs that can accept a 3-seat paid minimum and AI credit packaging

Starting from $9.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Frequently asked questions

Common buyer questions about Jira vs monday.com.

  • There is no universal winner between Jira and monday.com. Choose Jira when Software engineering / Agile teams. Choose monday.com when Teams standardising on one Work OS for projects, ops and cross-functional work. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.