SoftwareGlimpse

Jira vs Microsoft Project

Compare Jira and Microsoft Project on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources2 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Jira logo

Jira

7.7/10

Atlassian Agile issue tracker for software teams — Free ≤10; Standard from ~$8.15/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Software engineering / Agile teams
  • Orgs already on Atlassian
  • Regulated/enterprise software delivery

Starting from $8.15/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Jira and Microsoft Project. Choose Jira when Software engineering / Agile teams. Choose Microsoft Project when Microsoft 365 standardised orgs. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Jira is better for

  • Free plan
  • Automations
  • Value for money

Microsoft Project is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Collaboration

Tie

  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Integrations
  • AI features

Choose Jira if: Software engineering / Agile teams

Choose Microsoft Project if: Microsoft 365 standardised orgs

See detailed comparison ↓
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

7.4/10

Microsoft 365 project / Planner ladder for Gantt, resources and portfolios — Planner Plan 1 from ~$10/user/mo.

Best for

  • Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
  • Traditional PMO Gantt/resource needs
  • Enterprise portfolio planning on higher plans

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Jira and Microsoft Project. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    Depends

    Jira researched starting price from $8.15/mo; a free plan is researched; Microsoft Project researched starting price from $10/mo. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

    JiraDepends
    Microsoft ProjectDepends
  • Seat / licence minimum

    Minimum billed seats and how that changes small-team cost.

    Depends

    Check paid seat floors for Jira and Microsoft Project on current vendor packaging.

    JiraDepends
    Microsoft ProjectDepends
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Jira

    Jira researches a free plan; Microsoft Project does not research a free plan.

    JiraStronger
    Microsoft ProjectWeaker
  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on ease of use (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Jira5/10
    Microsoft Project6/10
  • Timeline / Gantt

    Native timeline, Gantt, or dependency planning.

    Tie

    Jira and Microsoft Project are close on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Jira9/10
    Microsoft Project9/10
  • Automations

    Rules, recipes, and workflow automations in the work OS.

    Jira

    Jira leads on automations (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Jira8/10
    Microsoft Project6/10
  • Collaboration

    Docs, comments, chat, proofing, and guest collaboration quality.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on collaboration (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Jira6/10
    Microsoft Project7/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Jira and Microsoft Project are close on integrations (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Jira9/10
    Microsoft Project9/10
  • AI features

    Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.

    Tie

    Jira and Microsoft Project are close on ai features (6/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Jira6/10
    Microsoft Project6/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Tie

    Jira and Microsoft Project are close on reporting (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Jira8/10
    Microsoft Project8/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Jira

    Jira leads on value for money (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Jira8/10
    Microsoft Project6/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.