SoftwareGlimpse

Gusto vs Paylocity

Choose Gusto for transparent US SMB payroll (award). Choose Paylocity when mid-market payroll+HR with Community/Ignite AI is the job and you will take a quote. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
Gusto logo

Gusto

7.1/10

US SMB payroll + benefits + light HR — Simple from $49/mo + $6/person; Plus $80 + $12; Premium $180 + $22.

Best for

  • Published SMB payroll
  • Month-to-month US pay runs

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

Choose Gusto for transparent US SMB payroll (award). Choose Paylocity when mid-market payroll+HR with Community/Ignite AI is the job and you will take a quote.

Paylocity is better for

  • Hiring workflow
  • Core HRIS depth
  • Scheduling depth
  • Training depth

Tie

  • Payroll processing

Choose Gusto if: Published SMB payroll

Choose Paylocity if: Mid-market HR + payroll

See detailed comparison ↓
Paylocity logo

Paylocity

7.7/10

US mid-market HR + payroll (+ finance/IT) — custom quote (‘Explore Payroll Pricing’); Ignite AI. Landscape vs Gusto.

Best for

  • Mid-market HR + payroll
  • Employee Community / Ignite AI

No free plan

Gusto vs Paylocity at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Gusto

    Paylocity

  • Free planDepends

    Gusto

    Paylocity

  • User / licence minimumDepends

    Gusto

    Paylocity

  • Hiring workflowPaylocity

    Gusto

    Paylocity

  • Core HRIS depthPaylocity

    Gusto

    Paylocity

Which HR software is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Gusto

    Published SMB payroll

    Pick Gusto for Published SMB payroll.

  • Gusto

    Month-to-month US pay runs

    Pick Gusto for Month-to-month US pay runs.

  • Paylocity

    Mid-market HR + payroll

    Pick Paylocity for Mid-market HR + payroll.

  • Paylocity

    Employee Community / Ignite AI

    Pick Paylocity for Employee Community / Ignite AI.

  • Paylocity

    Best for hiring workflow

    Paylocity is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (4/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

  • Paylocity

    Best for core hris depth

    Paylocity is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (5/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Gusto

    Gusto Simple $49/mo + $6/person (first-party). Paylocity is a customized quote with no published PEPM.

    Paylocity

    Gusto Simple $49/mo + $6/person (first-party). Paylocity is a customized quote with no published PEPM.

  • Hiring workflow

    Paylocity wins

    Gusto

    Trails Paylocity on this criterion

    Paylocity

    Paylocity is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (4/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

  • Core HRIS depth

    Paylocity wins

    Gusto

    Trails Paylocity on this criterion

    Paylocity

    Paylocity is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (5/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

  • Payroll processing

    Tie

    Gusto

    Gusto and Paylocity are close on payroll processing (9/10 vs 9/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    Paylocity

    Gusto and Paylocity are close on payroll processing (9/10 vs 9/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

  • Scheduling depth

    Paylocity wins

    Gusto

    Trails Paylocity on this criterion

    Paylocity

    Paylocity is the stronger fit for workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

  • Training depth

    Paylocity wins

    Gusto

    Trails Paylocity on this criterion

    Paylocity

    Paylocity is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (2/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

Which should you choose?

Choose Gusto if

  • Published SMB payroll
  • Month-to-month US pay runs

Choose Paylocity if

  • Mid-market HR + payroll
  • Employee Community / Ignite AI

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Gusto and Paylocity?

Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.