Gusto vs Paylocity
Gusto fits published smb payroll; Paylocity fits mid-market hr + payroll.
Gusto
US SMB payroll + benefits + light HR — Simple from $49/mo + $6/person; Plus $80 + $12; Premium $180 + $22.
Best for
- • Published SMB payroll
- • Month-to-month US pay runs
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
Choose Gusto for transparent US SMB payroll (award). Choose Paylocity when mid-market payroll+HR with Community/Ignite AI is the job and you will take a quote.
Paylocity is better for
- ✓ Hiring workflow
- ✓ Core HRIS depth
- ✓ Scheduling depth
- ✓ Training depth
Tie
- • Payroll processing
Choose Gusto if: Published SMB payroll
Choose Paylocity if: Mid-market HR + payroll
Paylocity
US mid-market HR + payroll (+ finance/IT) — custom quote (‘Explore Payroll Pricing’); Ignite AI. Landscape vs Gusto.
Best for
- • Mid-market HR + payroll
- • Employee Community / Ignite AI
No free plan
Quick verdict
Start here — then dig into the evidence below.
Choose Gusto if…
- Published SMB payroll
- Month-to-month US pay runs
Choose Paylocity if…
- Mid-market HR + payroll
- Employee Community / Ignite AI
- You prioritize hiring workflow
- You prioritize core hris depth
Overall recommendation
Choose Gusto for transparent US SMB payroll (award). Choose Paylocity when mid-market payroll+HR with Community/Ignite AI is the job and you will take a quote.
Key trade-off
Paylocity's clearest edge is hiring workflow.
Winner by category
Only dimensions with researched evidence for this pair.
| Dimension | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Hiring workflow | Paylocity wins | Paylocity is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (4/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI. |
| Core HRIS depth | Paylocity wins | Paylocity is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (5/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI. |
| Payroll processing | Tie | Gusto and Paylocity are close on payroll processing (9/10 vs 9/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI. |
| Scheduling depth | Paylocity wins | Paylocity is the stronger fit for workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI. |
| Training depth | Paylocity wins | Paylocity is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (2/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI. |
| Time tracking depth | Paylocity wins | Paylocity is the stronger fit for time tracking (5/10 vs 7/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI. |
| Integrations | Paylocity wins | Paylocity is the stronger fit for integrations (7/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI. |
| Mobile / frontline | Paylocity wins | Paylocity is the stronger fit for mobile and frontline use (6/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI. |
Side-by-side feature matrix
Normalized availability from product research — empty rows are not shown.
Hiring
| Feature | Gusto | Paylocity |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant tracking | Moderate | Strong |
| Career site & job boards | Limited | Moderate |
| Interview scheduling | Limited | Moderate |
Workforce
| Feature | Gusto | Paylocity |
|---|---|---|
| Workforce scheduling | Limited | Moderate |
| Frontline communications | Limited | Moderate |
| Time & attendance | Moderate | Strong |
| GPS / geofence clock-in | Limited | Moderate |
People & payroll
| Feature | Gusto | Paylocity |
|---|---|---|
| Core HRIS | Moderate | Strong |
| Payroll processing | Strong | Strong |
| Benefits administration | Strong | Strong |
Training
| Feature | Gusto | Paylocity |
|---|---|---|
| SOP / knowledge base | Limited | Moderate |
| Employee training paths | Limited | Strong |
| LMS / course commerce | Limited | Limited |
Platform
| Feature | Gusto | Paylocity |
|---|---|---|
| HRIS integrations | Strong | Strong |
| Analytics & reporting | Moderate | Strong |
| AI assistance | Moderate | Strong |
Pricing comparison
Pricing evidence last checked Aug 18, 2026.
Gusto
From $49.00/user/mo
- Simple$49.00/mo
- Plus$80.00/mo
- Premium$180.00/mo
- Contractor Only$35.00/mo
Paylocity
- Paylocity platformCustom
Seat-count estimates
Labeled estimates from verified starting per-seat pricing — not invoices.
| Seats | Gusto | Paylocity |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | ~$245.00/mo (5 × starting seat) | — |
| 10 | ~$490.00/mo (10 × starting seat) | — |
| 25 | ~$1,225.00/mo (25 × starting seat) | — |
| 50 | ~$2,450.00/mo (50 × starting seat) | — |
Estimate from verified starting per-seat pricing — actual total depends on plan, annual discounts, and add-ons.
Research 2026-08-18 from first-party pages. Paylocity ‘Explore Payroll Pricing’ is quote-led. Affiliate economics excluded.
Best for
Scenario picks from researched strengths — not a universal ranking.
- → Gusto
Published SMB payroll
Pick Gusto for Published SMB payroll.
- → Gusto
Month-to-month US pay runs
Pick Gusto for Month-to-month US pay runs.
- → Paylocity
Mid-market HR + payroll
Pick Paylocity for Mid-market HR + payroll.
- → Paylocity
Employee Community / Ignite AI
Pick Paylocity for Employee Community / Ignite AI.
- → Paylocity
Best for hiring workflow
Paylocity is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (4/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
- → Paylocity
Best for core hris depth
Paylocity is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (5/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
The differences that actually matter
Pair-specific analysis for Gusto vs Paylocity — not generic category copy.
Starting pricing
DependsStarting pricing: Gusto — Gusto Simple $49/mo + $6/person (first-party). Paylocity is a customized quote with no published PEPM.. Paylocity — Gusto Simple $49/mo + $6/person (first-party). Paylocity is a customized quote with no published PEPM.. Feature evidence also diverges on Applicant tracking (Gusto: Moderate; Paylocity: Strong); Career site & job boards (Gusto: Limited; Paylocity: Moderate); Interview scheduling (Gusto: Limited; Paylocity: Moderate).
Hiring workflow
Paylocity aheadOn hiring workflow, Paylocity is ahead. Gusto: Trails Paylocity on this criterion. Paylocity: Paylocity is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (4/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI..
Core HRIS depth
Paylocity aheadOn core hris depth, Paylocity is ahead. Gusto: Trails Paylocity on this criterion. Paylocity: Paylocity is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (5/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI..
Payroll processing
TieGusto and Paylocity are close on payroll processing. Gusto and Paylocity are close on payroll processing (9/10 vs 9/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Scheduling depth
Paylocity aheadOn scheduling depth, Paylocity is ahead. Gusto: Trails Paylocity on this criterion. Paylocity: Paylocity is the stronger fit for workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI..
Training depth
Paylocity aheadOn training depth, Paylocity is ahead. Gusto: Trails Paylocity on this criterion. Paylocity: Paylocity is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (2/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI..
Pros and cons
Product-specific for this pair — derived from researched outcomes and editorial notes.
Gusto
Cons
- Trails on hiring workflow
- Trails on core hris depth
- Trails on scheduling depth
Paylocity
Pros
- Stronger on hiring workflow
- Stronger on core hris depth
- Stronger on scheduling depth
- Stronger on training depth
Who should not choose each product
Decision quality improves when we say who should walk away.
Don't choose Gusto if…
- You need Paylocity's stronger hiring workflow more than Gusto's strengths
- You need Paylocity's stronger core hris depth more than Gusto's strengths
- You need Paylocity's stronger scheduling depth more than Gusto's strengths
- Your primary fit looks closer to: Mid-market HR + payroll
Don't choose Paylocity if…
- Your primary fit looks closer to: Published SMB payroll
- Your primary fit looks closer to: Month-to-month US pay runs
Alternatives worth considering
When neither product is the right fit.
Unified people platform (HR + payroll + IT/spend) — published SMB floor $8/user/mo plus $40/mo platform fee; modules are quote-stacked.
SMB/mid-market core HRIS with Core/Pro/Elite PEPM tiers — Core from $10/employee/mo above 25 employees, or $250/mo flat floor for smaller teams.
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
Mid-market payroll + HR (Select / Plus / Premium packaging) — custom PEPM quote; no published seat $. Landscape vs Gusto.
Final verdict
Scenario-level close — not a repeat of the intro.
Gusto wins when…
Published SMB payroll
Paylocity wins when…
Mid-market HR + payroll
- Published SMB payrollGusto
- Month-to-month US pay runsGusto
- Mid-market HR + payrollPaylocity
- Employee Community / Ignite AIPaylocity
Which one should you choose?
Choose Gusto if:
- Published SMB payroll
- Month-to-month US pay runs
Choose Paylocity if:
- Mid-market HR + payroll
- Employee Community / Ignite AI
FAQ
- Is Gusto better than Paylocity?
- Choose Gusto for transparent US SMB payroll (award). Choose Paylocity when mid-market payroll+HR with Community/Ignite AI is the job and you will take a quote.
- Which HR software fits which team?
- Gusto: Published SMB payroll Paylocity: Mid-market HR + payroll
- Which is stronger for hiring workflow?
- Paylocity is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (4/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
- Which is stronger for core hris depth?
- Paylocity is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (5/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
- Which is stronger for payroll processing?
- Gusto and Paylocity are close on payroll processing (9/10 vs 9/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
- Which is stronger for scheduling depth?
- Paylocity is the stronger fit for workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
- Which is stronger for time tracking depth?
- Paylocity is the stronger fit for time tracking (5/10 vs 7/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
- Which is stronger for training depth?
- Paylocity is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (2/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
- Does Gusto or Paylocity have a free plan?
- Gusto: No free plan. Paylocity: No free plan.
- How does Gusto vs Paylocity pricing compare?
- Gusto starts from $49.00/user/mo. Confirm live vendor pricing before purchasing.
- How did SoftwareGlimpse compare these products?
- We map both products to the same category criteria, then evaluate trade-offs using verified product, pricing and feature evidence. Affiliate relationships never change outcomes.
- reviewGusto review
- reviewPaylocity review
- pricingGusto pricing
- pricingPaylocity pricing
- alternativeRippling alternative
- alternativeBambooHR alternative
- alternativeGreenhouse alternative
- guideWhat Is HR Software?
- guideHow to Choose HR Software
- guideHR Software Pricing Guide
- categoryHR software hub
- finderBest HR software
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider
Rippling
Unified people platform (HR + payroll + IT/spend) — published SMB floor $8/user/mo plus $40/mo platform fee; modules are quote-stacked.
BambooHR
SMB/mid-market core HRIS with Core/Pro/Elite PEPM tiers — Core from $10/employee/mo above 25 employees, or $250/mo flat floor for smaller teams.
Greenhouse
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
ADP Workforce Now
Mid-market payroll + HR (Select / Plus / Premium packaging) — custom PEPM quote; no published seat $. Landscape vs Gusto.
Still deciding between Gusto and Paylocity?
Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.
Part of Software comparisons · HR Software hub
Try a decision tool
Interactive helpers use recommendation criteria — affiliate status never changes outcomes.