SoftwareGlimpse

New Relic vs Datadog

New Relic fits teams that want apm + logs + infra in one ingest bill; Datadog fits sre/platform teams needing unified infra + apm + logs.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources10 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
New Relic logo

New Relic

8/10

Observability — Free 100 GB ingest + 1 full user; Standard from $10 first full user then $99; data $0.40/GB after 100 GB; Pro $349/full user annual.

Best for

  • • Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill
  • • Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users
  • • Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hosts

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Visit New Relic
Read review

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

Datadog is the stronger overall fit

Same-cluster observability peer comparison. Choose New Relic when unified observability billed on ingest + users is the job — not Datadog host packs and not ITSM. Choose Datadog when observability — infrastructure, APM, and logs — is the primary job and you can model module/consumption TCO. Overall: New Relic 8 vs Datadog 8.6. Not hands-on lab tested; confirm live pricing and packaging.

Datadog is better for

  • ✓ ITSM depth
  • ✓ Observability depth
  • ✓ Source control depth
  • ✓ Hosting panel depth

Tie

  • • Free plan

Choose New Relic if: Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill

Choose Datadog if: SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs

See detailed comparison ↓
Stronger overall fit
Datadog logo

Datadog

8.6/10

Observability suite — infrastructure, APM, logs, and security signals with consumption/host pricing; Infrastructure Pro from $15/host/mo annual.

Best for

  • • SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs
  • • Cloud-native orgs with AWS/Azure/GCP estates
  • • Teams that can model multi-module observability TCO upfront

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Visit Datadog
Read review

Quick verdict

Start here — then dig into the evidence below.

Choose New Relic if…

  • Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill
  • Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users
  • Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hosts

Choose Datadog if…

  • SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs
  • Cloud-native orgs with AWS/Azure/GCP estates
  • Teams that can model multi-module observability TCO upfront
  • You prioritize itsm depth

Overall recommendation

Same-cluster observability peer comparison. Choose New Relic when unified observability billed on ingest + users is the job — not Datadog host packs and not ITSM. Choose Datadog when observability — infrastructure, APM, and logs — is the primary job and you can model module/consumption TCO. Overall: New Relic 8 vs Datadog 8.6. Not hands-on lab tested; confirm live pricing and packaging.

Key trade-off

Datadog's clearest edge is itsm depth.

Winner by category

Only dimensions with researched evidence for this pair.

DimensionWinnerWhy
Free planTieNew Relic and Datadog both research a free plan. Confirm what each path unlocks on the live vendor pricing page.
ITSM depthDatadog winsDatadog leads on ITSM depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation.
Observability depthDatadog winsDatadog leads on observability depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation.
Source control depthDatadog winsDatadog leads on source control depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation.
Hosting panel depthDatadog winsDatadog leads on hosting panel depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation.
Web data / proxy depthDatadog winsDatadog leads on web data / proxy depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation.
Security & adminDatadog winsDatadog leads on security & admin (8/10 vs 9/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation.
IntegrationsDatadog winsDatadog leads on integrations (8/10 vs 9/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation.

Side-by-side feature matrix

Normalized availability from product research — empty rows are not shown.

Capabilities

FeatureNew RelicDatadog
Incident managementModerateModerate
Change & problem managementLimitedLimited
Service catalogLimitedLimited
Infrastructure monitoringStrongStrong
APM & distributed tracingStrongStrong
Log managementStrongStrong
Source control & reposLimitedLimited
CI/CD & automationModerateModerate
Hosting control panelLimitedLimited
Proxy / web data networkLimitedLimited
ITSM AI assistanceModerateModerate
Developer AI assistanceModerateModerate
On-call & pagingModerateNot evidenced
Enterprise security & SSOStrongStrong
Analytics & reportingStrongStrong

Pricing comparison

Pricing evidence last checked Sep 8, 2026.

New Relic logo

New Relic

From $10.00/user/mo

Free plan availableNo free trial evidenced
  • Free$0.00/user/mo
  • Standard (first full user)$10.00/user/mo
  • Pro (full platform user)$349.00/user/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom
Datadog logo

Datadog

From $15.00/user/mo

Free plan availableFree trial available
  • Free$0.00/user/mo
  • Infrastructure ProSee details
  • Enterprise / CustomCustom

Seat-count estimates

Labeled estimates from verified starting per-seat pricing — not invoices.

SeatsNew RelicDatadog
5~$50.00/mo (5 × starting seat)~$75.00/mo (5 × starting seat)
10~$100.00/mo (10 × starting seat)~$150.00/mo (10 × starting seat)
25~$250.00/mo (25 × starting seat)~$375.00/mo (25 × starting seat)
50~$500.00/mo (50 × starting seat)~$750.00/mo (50 × starting seat)

Estimate from verified starting per-seat pricing — actual total depends on plan, annual discounts, and add-ons.

Research 2026-08-18 from first-party pages. Affiliate economics excluded. Confirm live packaging — seats, hosts, GB, CI minutes, and add-ons change TCO.

Open cost calculator →

Best for

Scenario picks from researched strengths — not a universal ranking.

  • → New Relic

    Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill

    Pick New Relic for Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill.

  • → New Relic

    Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users

    Pick New Relic for Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users.

  • → New Relic

    Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hosts

    Pick New Relic for Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hosts.

  • → Datadog

    SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs

    Pick Datadog for SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs.

  • → Datadog

    Cloud-native orgs with AWS/Azure/GCP estates

    Pick Datadog for Cloud-native orgs with AWS/Azure/GCP estates.

  • → Datadog

    Teams that can model multi-module observability TCO upfront

    Pick Datadog for Teams that can model multi-module observability TCO upfront.

The differences that actually matter

Pair-specific analysis for New Relic vs Datadog — not generic category copy.

  • ITSM depth

    Datadog ahead

    On itsm depth, Datadog is ahead. New Relic: Trails Datadog on this criterion. Datadog: Datadog leads on ITSM depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation..

  • Observability depth

    Datadog ahead

    On observability depth, Datadog is ahead. New Relic: Trails Datadog on this criterion. Datadog: Datadog leads on observability depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation..

  • Source control depth

    Datadog ahead

    On source control depth, Datadog is ahead. New Relic: Trails Datadog on this criterion. Datadog: Datadog leads on source control depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation..

  • Hosting panel depth

    Datadog ahead

    On hosting panel depth, Datadog is ahead. New Relic: Trails Datadog on this criterion. Datadog: Datadog leads on hosting panel depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation..

  • Web data / proxy depth

    Datadog ahead

    On web data / proxy depth, Datadog is ahead. New Relic: Trails Datadog on this criterion. Datadog: Datadog leads on web data / proxy depth (9/10 vs 10/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation..

  • Security & admin

    Datadog ahead

    On security & admin, Datadog is ahead. New Relic: Trails Datadog on this criterion. Datadog: Datadog leads on security & admin (8/10 vs 9/10). Landscape or cluster fit from vendor documentation..

Pros and cons

Product-specific for this pair — derived from researched outcomes and editorial notes.

New Relic logo

New Relic

Cons

  • Trails on itsm depth
  • Trails on observability depth
  • Trails on source control depth
Datadog logo

Datadog

Pros

  • Stronger on itsm depth
  • Stronger on observability depth
  • Stronger on source control depth
  • Stronger on hosting panel depth

Who should not choose each product

Decision quality improves when we say who should walk away.

Don't choose New Relic if…

  • You need Datadog's stronger itsm depth more than New Relic's strengths
  • You need Datadog's stronger observability depth more than New Relic's strengths
  • You need Datadog's stronger source control depth more than New Relic's strengths
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs

Don't choose Datadog if…

  • Your primary fit looks closer to: Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users

Alternatives worth considering

When neither product is the right fit.

  • Dynatrace logoDynatrace

    Enterprise observability — Dynatrace Platform Subscription (DPS) annual commit + rate card. Full-Stack list unit ~$58/mo per 8 GiB host; 15-day trial. No per-seat SKU.

  • Grafana Cloud logoGrafana Cloud

    Managed Grafana observability — Free 10k series / 50 GB logs; Pro from $19/mo platform fee + usage ($6.50/1k series, $8/user).

  • Splunk Observability Cloud logoSplunk Observability Cloud

    Splunk Observability Cloud — Infrastructure Monitoring from $15/host/mo annual; App & Infra $60/host; End-to-End $75/host; free up to 15 hosts. Not Splunk Platform/SIEM ingest.

  • Elastic Observability logoElastic Observability

    Observability on Elastic Cloud — Hosted Standard from $99/mo (120 GB / 2 zones); Serverless Observability usage from ~$0.07–$0.09/GB ingest; self-managed OSS path.

Final verdict

Scenario-level close — not a repeat of the intro.

New Relic wins when…

Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill

Datadog wins when…

SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs

  • Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest billNew Relic
  • Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full usersNew Relic
  • Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hostsNew Relic
  • SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logsDatadog

Which one should you choose?

Choose New Relic if:

  • Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill
  • Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users
  • Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hosts

Choose Datadog if:

  • SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs
  • Cloud-native orgs with AWS/Azure/GCP estates
  • Teams that can model multi-module observability TCO upfront

Product screenshots

Real product UI from our media library — no placeholders.

New Relic

  • Official New Relic Session Replay marketing UI from newrelic.com — not a SoftwareGlimpse lab screenshot.
  • Official New Relic platform marketing UI from newrelic.com — not a SoftwareGlimpse lab screenshot.
  • Official New Relic SRE Agent marketing UI from newrelic.com — not a SoftwareGlimpse lab screenshot.
  • Official New Relic Session Replay marketing UI from newrelic.com — not a SoftwareGlimpse lab screenshot.

Datadog

  • Official Datadog Open Graph marketing visual from datadoghq.com — not a SoftwareGlimpse lab screenshot.
  • Official Datadog Open Graph marketing visual from datadoghq.com — not a SoftwareGlimpse lab screenshot.
  • Official Datadog host-map marketing UI from datadoghq.com — not a SoftwareGlimpse lab screenshot.
  • Official Datadog APM marketing UI from datadoghq.com — not a SoftwareGlimpse lab screenshot.

FAQ

Is New Relic better than Datadog?
Datadog is the stronger overall fit. Same-cluster observability peer comparison. Choose New Relic when unified observability billed on ingest + users is the job — not Datadog host packs and not ITSM. Choose Datadog when observability — infrastructure, APM, and logs — is the primary job and you can model module/consumption TCO. Overall: New Relic 8 vs Datadog 8.6. Not hands-on lab tested; confirm live pricing and packaging.
Which It Development fits which team?
New Relic: Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill Datadog: SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs
Does New Relic or Datadog have a free plan?
New Relic: Free plan available. Datadog: Free plan available.
How does New Relic vs Datadog pricing compare?
New Relic starts from $10.00/user/mo. Datadog starts from $15.00/user/mo. Confirm live vendor pricing before purchasing.
How did SoftwareGlimpse compare these products?
We map both products to the same category criteria, then evaluate trade-offs using verified product, pricing and feature evidence. Affiliate relationships never change outcomes.

Still deciding between New Relic and Datadog?

Use Find My CRM for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

Find My CRMCompare another
  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.

Part of Software comparisons · IT & Development Software hub

Try a decision tool

Interactive helpers use recommendation criteria — affiliate status never changes outcomes.