Cloze vs Nimble
Compare Cloze and Nimble on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Cloze
Relationship/real-estate CRM; Pro $17 through Platinum $42/user/mo annual with 14-day trial.
Best for
- • Relationship CRM popular with real-estate and advisors, with Pro through Platinum annual per-user plans and a 14-day trial
- • Automatic relationship management CRM that keeps people, deals, and follow-ups organized — strong for real estate professionals.
Starting from $17.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Cloze and Nimble. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.
Nimble is better for
- ✓ Sales automation
- ✓ Integrations
Tie
- • Ease of use
- • Pipeline management
- • Email capabilities
Choose Cloze if: Relationship CRM popular with real-estate and advisors, with Pro through Platinum annual per-user plans and a 14-day trial
Choose Nimble if: Social and relationship CRM with Gmail/Outlook sync, contact enrichment, and a single Business plan for teams
Nimble
Social/relationship CRM with Gmail and Outlook sync; Business plan from $24.90/user/mo annual.
Best for
- • Social and relationship CRM with Gmail/Outlook sync, contact enrichment, and a single Business plan for teams
- • Relationship CRM that unifies contacts, social signals, and email for sales and marketing teams.
Starting from $24.90/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
8
Criteria
10
Screenshots
4
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Cloze Pricing | Cloze | official-pricing-page |
| Cloze | Cloze | official-product-page |
| Cloze Pricing (fixture snapshot) | Cloze | fixture |
| Cloze Product (fixture snapshot) | Cloze | fixture |
| Nimble Pricing | Nimble | official-pricing-page |
| Nimble | Nimble | official-product-page |
| Nimble Pricing (fixture snapshot) | Nimble | fixture |
| Nimble Product (fixture snapshot) | Nimble | fixture |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.