SoftwareGlimpse

Breezy HR vs Workable

Choose Breezy HR if a free ATS tier or lower published floors matter. Choose Workable if you want a 15-day full Standard trial and optional HRIS-lite alongside recruiting. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20265 evidence sources5 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Breezy HR logo

Breezy HR

7.9/10

Mid-market ATS with free Bootstrap, paid Startup/Growth/Business pools, career site, and interview workflows — Growth from $273/mo annual.

Best for

  • Start on a free ATS
  • Lower published paid floors

Starting from $157.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

Choose Breezy HR if a free ATS tier or lower published floors matter. Choose Workable if you want a 15-day full Standard trial and optional HRIS-lite alongside recruiting.

Breezy HR is better for

  • Free plan
  • Hiring workflow
  • Integrations
  • Mobile / frontline

Workable is better for

  • Core HRIS depth
  • Payroll processing
  • Scheduling depth
  • Training depth

Choose Breezy HR if: Start on a free ATS

Choose Workable if: 15-day Standard trial

See detailed comparison ↓
Workable logo

Workable

7.2/10

Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.

Best for

  • 15-day Standard trial
  • ATS plus light HR features

Starting from $299.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

5

Criteria

11

Screenshots

5

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Breezy HR — Official SiteBreezy HRofficial-product-page
Breezy HR PricingBreezy HRofficial-pricing-page
Breezy HR PricingBreezy HRofficial-product-page
Workable — Official SiteWorkableofficial-product-page
Workable PricingWorkableofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.