SoftwareGlimpse

Ashby vs Deputy

Compare Ashby and Deputy on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
Ashby logo

Ashby

7.9/10

Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.

Best for

  • Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
  • TA teams comparing Ashby vs Greenhouse for AI-native hiring
  • Orgs willing to pay a high Foundations floor instead of a free ATS

Starting from $400.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Deputy is better for

  • Starting pricing

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose Ashby if: Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform

Choose Deputy if: Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance

See detailed comparison ↓
Deputy logo

Deputy

8.2/10

Mid-market hourly WFM — Lite $5 / Core $6.50 / Pro $9 per user/mo; $30 invoice minimum; up to 31-day trial.

Best for

  • Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance
  • Teams that will trial Core for up to 31 days before Homebase-style SMB hubs
  • Ops leaders who want WFM AI with a human-in-the-loop

Starting from $5.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

4

Screenshots

0

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Ashby — Official SiteAshbyofficial-product-page
Ashby PricingAshbyofficial-pricing-page
Deputy — Official SiteDeputyofficial-product-page
Deputy PricingDeputyofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.