Asana vs Linear
Compare Asana and Linear on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Asana
Cross-functional work management with goals, workflows and AI Studio — Starter from $10.99/user/mo annual.
Best for
- • Cross-functional marketing/ops teams
- • Buyers prioritising adoption ease and goals/workflows
- • Mid-market work management shortlists
Starting from $10.99/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Asana and Linear. Choose Asana when Cross-functional marketing/ops teams. Choose Linear when Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana is better for
- ✓ Automations
- ✓ Collaboration
- ✓ AI features
- ✓ Reporting
Linear is better for
- ✓ Value for money
Tie
- • Free plan
- • Ease of use
- • Timeline / Gantt
Choose Asana if: Cross-functional marketing/ops teams
Choose Linear if: Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX
Linear
Modern issue tracker for product/engineering teams — Free limited; Basic from ~$8/user/mo annual.
Best for
- • Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX
- • Startups replacing Jira complexity
- • Issue-centric software delivery
Starting from $8.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Comparison scorecard
Criterion-by-criterion results for Asana and Linear. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.
- Depends
Starting pricing
Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.
Asana researched starting price from $10.99/mo; a free plan is researched; Linear researched starting price from $8/mo; a free plan is researched. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.
AsanaDependsLinearDepends - Depends
Seat / licence minimum
Minimum billed seats and how that changes small-team cost.
Check paid seat floors for Asana and Linear on current vendor packaging.
AsanaDependsLinearDepends - Tie
Free plan
Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.
Asana researches a free plan; Linear researches a free plan.
AsanaTieLinearTie - Tie
Ease of use
How quickly teams become productive.
Asana and Linear are close on ease of use (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana9/10Linear9/10 - Tie
Timeline / Gantt
Native timeline, Gantt, or dependency planning.
Asana and Linear are close on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana9/10Linear9/10 - Asana
Automations
Rules, recipes, and workflow automations in the work OS.
Asana leads on automations (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana8/10Linear7/10 - Asana
Collaboration
Docs, comments, chat, proofing, and guest collaboration quality.
Asana leads on collaboration (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana9/10Linear7/10 - Tie
Integrations
Important third-party integrations.
Asana and Linear are close on integrations (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana8/10Linear8/10 - Asana
AI features
Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.
Asana leads on ai features (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana8/10Linear7/10 - Asana
Reporting
Reporting and forecasting quality.
Asana leads on reporting (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana8/10Linear7/10 - Linear
Value for money
Capability relative to total cost of ownership.
Linear leads on value for money (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Asana7/10Linear8/10
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.