SoftwareGlimpse

Airtable vs Hive

Compare Airtable and Hive on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources5 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Airtable logo

Airtable

7.2/10

Flexible database / app platform with interfaces and light project apps — Team from ~$20/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Ops teams building data apps
  • Structured trackers beyond plain docs
  • Interface-driven internal tools

Starting from $20.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Airtable and Hive. Choose Airtable when Ops teams building data apps. Choose Hive when SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Airtable is better for

  • Integrations

Hive is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Automations
  • Value for money

Tie

  • Free plan
  • Collaboration
  • AI features

Choose Airtable if: Ops teams building data apps

Choose Hive if: SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday

See detailed comparison ↓
Hive logo

Hive

7.6/10

Work management platform with free plan (≤10 members) and Teams from $12/user/mo annual — strong monday.com peer.

Best for

  • SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday
  • Teams that can start on Free (≤10) before upgrading to Teams
  • Buyers comparing monday.com as a primary Work OS peer

Starting from $5.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

11

Screenshots

5

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Airtable — Official SiteAirtableofficial-product-page
Airtable PricingAirtableofficial-pricing-page
Hive — Official SiteHiveofficial-product-page
Hive PricingHiveofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.