SoftwareGlimpse

Agile CRM vs Close

Compare Agile CRM and Close on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20269 evidence sources14 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Agile CRM logo

Agile CRM

6.6/10

Freemium all-in-one CRM; Free (10 users), Starter from ~$8.99/user/mo on multi-year headline pricing.

Best for

  • All-in-one CRM with a free tier (10 users) and Starter/Regular/Enterprise plans for sales, marketing, and service
  • Affordable all-in-one CRM combining sales, marketing automation, and service for growing teams.

Starting from $8.99/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Agile CRM and Close. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Agile CRM is better for

  • Value for money

Close is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Pipeline management
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities

Choose Agile CRM if: All-in-one CRM with a free tier (10 users) and Starter/Regular/Enterprise plans for sales, marketing, and service

Choose Close if: Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM

See detailed comparison ↓
Close logo

Close

7.4/10

Sales-focused CRM for pipeline management and sales engagement workflows.

Best for

  • Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM
  • Teams that need dialing power and advanced outreach workflows
  • Teams that rely on calling, email, and SMS from the CRM

Starting from $9.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Agile CRM and Close. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Close

    Close leads on ease of use (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRM7/10
    Close8/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    Close

    Close leads on pipeline management (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRM7/10
    Close8/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    Close

    Close leads on sales automation (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRM7/10
    Close8/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    Close

    Close leads on email capabilities (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRM7/10
    Close8/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Close

    Close leads on reporting (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRM6/10
    Close7/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    Close

    Close leads on customization (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRM6/10
    Close7/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Close

    Close leads on integrations (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRM6/10
    Close7/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    Close

    Close leads on administration (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRMWeaker
    CloseStronger
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    Close

    Close leads on scalability (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Agile CRM6/10
    Close8/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Agile CRM

    Better for value for money

    Agile CRM8/10
    Close6/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.