SoftwareGlimpse

New Relic vs Rootly

Compare New Relic and Rootly on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20266 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
New Relic logo

New Relic

8/10

Observability — Free 100 GB ingest + 1 full user; Standard from $10 first full user then $99; data $0.40/GB after 100 GB; Pro $349/full user annual.

Best for

  • Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill
  • Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users
  • Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hosts

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

New Relic is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Free plan
  • Security & admin

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose New Relic if: Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill

Choose Rootly if: Slack-first teams buying incident command at a published $20/user floor

See detailed comparison ↓
Rootly logo

Rootly

7.7/10

Incident response — Incident Response Essentials $20/user/mo; On-Call Essentials $20/user; Enterprise custom. Does not outrank PagerDuty 8.0.

Best for

  • Slack-first teams buying incident command at a published $20/user floor
  • Buyers who will add On-Call Essentials only if they need paging
  • Comparisons versus FireHydrant Pro $25 and incident.io Team $15

Starting from $20.00/user/mo

No free plan

Frequently asked questions

Common buyer questions about New Relic vs Rootly.

  • No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.