SoftwareGlimpse

Livestorm vs Zoom

Compare Livestorm and Zoom on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20266 evidence sources10 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Livestorm logo

Livestorm

6.8/10

Browser-based webinar and virtual events platform for marketing teams.

Best for

  • Marketing teams running webinars and virtual product events
  • Teams wanting browser-based events with CRM-connected registration
  • Organizations preferring attendee-credit pricing over host seats

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Livestorm is better for

  • Campaign content
  • Marketing automation
  • Funnel conversion
  • Analytics & attribution

Zoom is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Integrations
  • Scalability
  • Value for money

Choose Livestorm if: Marketing teams running webinars and virtual product events

Choose Zoom if: Organisations already standardised on Zoom meetings that want to add Zoom Phone

See detailed comparison ↓
Zoom logo

Zoom

8.4/10

Meetings-first Workplace suite plus Zoom Phone UCaaS — Phone US/CA Unlimited research floor ~$15–16/user/month; free meetings/chat exist but Phone is paid.

Best for

  • Organisations already standardised on Zoom meetings that want to add Zoom Phone
  • Hybrid teams that need video-first collaboration with optional cloud PBX
  • SMB through enterprise buyers who value freemium Workplace entry before paying for Phone

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

6

Criteria

10

Screenshots

10

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Livestorm — Official SiteLivestormofficial-product-page
Livestorm PricingLivestormofficial-pricing-page
Zoom — Official SiteZoomofficial-product-page
Zoom PricingZoomofficial-pricing-page
Zoom PhoneZoomofficial-product-page
Zoom AI CompanionZoomofficial-product-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.