Greenhouse vs Workable
Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring (kits, scorecards, governance) at mid-market/enterprise. Choose Workable for a dedicated ATS with published SMB floors and a trial. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.
Greenhouse
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
Best for
- • Structured hiring kits/scorecards
- • Enterprise/mid TA teams
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring (kits, scorecards, governance) at mid-market/enterprise. Choose Workable for a dedicated ATS with published SMB floors and a trial.
Greenhouse is better for
- ✓ Hiring workflow
- ✓ Integrations
Workable is better for
- ✓ Core HRIS depth
- ✓ Payroll processing
- ✓ Training depth
- ✓ Time tracking depth
Tie
- • Scheduling depth
Choose Greenhouse if: Structured hiring kits/scorecards
Choose Workable if: Published ATS floors + 15-day trial
Workable
Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.
Best for
- • Published ATS floors + 15-day trial
- • SMB recruiting with light HR
Starting from $299.00/user/mo
No free plan
Comparison scorecard
Criterion-by-criterion results for Greenhouse and Workable. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.
- Depends
Starting pricing
Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.
Greenhouse is custom quote (Core/Plus/Pro, no published seat $). Workable Standard is $299/mo annual for 1–20 employees.
GreenhouseDependsWorkableDepends - Depends
Free plan
Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.
Neither has a free plan. Workable offers a 15-day Standard trial; Greenhouse is demo-led.
GreenhouseDependsWorkableDepends - Depends
User / licence minimum
Seat floors, per-employee minimums, and small-team pricing traps.
Workable prices by company headcount bands. Greenhouse quotes by plan, hiring volume, and complexity.
GreenhouseDependsWorkableDepends - Greenhouse
Hiring workflow
Applicant tracking, job posts, interviews, and offer workflow depth.
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for hiring workflow (10/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
GreenhouseStrongerWorkableWeaker - Workable
Core HRIS depth
Employee records, PTO, onboarding, and people-admin as a system of record.
Workable is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (3/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
GreenhouseWeakerWorkableStronger - Workable
Payroll processing
Payroll depth, country coverage, and whether payroll is core or an add-on.
Workable is the stronger fit for payroll processing (1/10 vs 3/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
GreenhouseWeakerWorkableStronger - Tie
Scheduling depth
Shift scheduling, availability, and frontline rostering.
Greenhouse and Workable are close on workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
GreenhouseTieWorkableTie - Workable
Training depth
SOPs, onboarding paths, and employee training — not a full LMS by default.
Workable is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (2/10 vs 3/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
GreenhouseWeakerWorkableStronger - Workable
Time tracking depth
Clock-in, timesheets, geofencing, and attendance workflows.
Workable is the stronger fit for time tracking (2/10 vs 4/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
GreenhouseWeakerWorkableStronger - Greenhouse
Integrations
Important third-party integrations.
Greenhouse is the stronger fit for integrations (9/10 vs 7/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
Greenhouse9/10Workable7/10 - Workable
Mobile / frontline
Phone-first admin and hourly/frontline employee experience.
Workable is the stronger fit for mobile and frontline use (5/10 vs 6/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.
GreenhouseWeakerWorkableStronger
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.