Greenhouse vs Workable
Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring (kits, scorecards, governance) at mid-market/enterprise. Choose Workable for a dedicated ATS with published SMB floors and a trial. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.
Greenhouse
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
Best for
- • Structured hiring kits/scorecards
- • Enterprise/mid TA teams
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring (kits, scorecards, governance) at mid-market/enterprise. Choose Workable for a dedicated ATS with published SMB floors and a trial.
Greenhouse is better for
- ✓ Hiring workflow
- ✓ Integrations
Workable is better for
- ✓ Core HRIS depth
- ✓ Payroll processing
- ✓ Training depth
- ✓ Time tracking depth
Tie
- • Scheduling depth
Choose Greenhouse if: Structured hiring kits/scorecards
Choose Workable if: Published ATS floors + 15-day trial
Workable
Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.
Best for
- • Published ATS floors + 15-day trial
- • SMB recruiting with light HR
Starting from $299.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
4
Criteria
11
Screenshots
0
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse — Official Site | Greenhouse | official-product-page |
| Greenhouse Pricing | Greenhouse | official-pricing-page |
| Workable — Official Site | Workable | official-product-page |
| Workable Pricing | Workable | official-pricing-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.