SoftwareGlimpse

Grafana Cloud vs New Relic

Compare Grafana Cloud and New Relic on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20266 evidence sources9 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Grafana Cloud logo

Grafana Cloud

7.5/10

Managed Grafana observability — Free 10k series / 50 GB logs; Pro from $19/mo platform fee + usage ($6.50/1k series, $8/user).

Best for

  • Teams already fluent in Grafana/Prometheus
  • Startups that fit in the Free telemetry caps
  • Platform teams that want Mimir/Loki without operating it

Starting from $19.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Grafana Cloud and New Relic. Choose Grafana Cloud when Teams already fluent in Grafana/Prometheus. Choose New Relic when Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

New Relic is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Security & admin

Tie

  • Free plan
  • Integrations

Choose Grafana Cloud if: Teams already fluent in Grafana/Prometheus

Choose New Relic if: Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill

See detailed comparison ↓
New Relic logo

New Relic

8/10

Observability — Free 100 GB ingest + 1 full user; Standard from $10 first full user then $99; data $0.40/GB after 100 GB; Pro $349/full user annual.

Best for

  • Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill
  • Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users
  • Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hosts

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Frequently asked questions

Common buyer questions about Grafana Cloud vs New Relic.

  • There is no universal winner between Grafana Cloud and New Relic. Choose Grafana Cloud when Teams already fluent in Grafana/Prometheus. Choose New Relic when Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.