Genesys vs Microsoft Teams
Compare Genesys and Microsoft Teams on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Genesys
Enterprise CCaaS (Genesys Cloud CX) — CX 1 from $75/user/mo annual; CX 2 $115; CX 3 $155; CX 4 $240.
Best for
- • Enterprise contact centres that need omnichannel + WEM + journey orchestration
- • Regulated industries standardising on Genesys Cloud CX
- • Buyers comparing CCaaS platforms (not UCaaS phone seats)
Starting from $75.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Genesys is better for
- ✓ Number / country coverage
- ✓ Power dialer
- ✓ WhatsApp Business
- ✓ Routing & IVR
Tie
- • CRM / CTI integrations
Choose Genesys if: Enterprise contact centres that need omnichannel + WEM + journey orchestration
Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

Microsoft Teams
M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.
Best for
- • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
- • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
- • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features
Starting from $0.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
6
Criteria
9
Screenshots
10
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Genesys — Official Site | Genesys | official-product-page |
| Genesys Pricing | Genesys | official-pricing-page |
| Microsoft Teams — Official Site | Microsoft Teams | official-product-page |
| Microsoft Teams Pricing | Microsoft Teams | official-pricing-page |
| Microsoft Teams Phone | Microsoft Teams | official-product-page |
| Compare Microsoft Teams options | Microsoft Teams | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.