FireHydrant vs New Relic
Compare FireHydrant and New Relic on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

FireHydrant
Incident response — Free up to 10 responders; Pro $25/responder/mo annual; Enterprise custom; 14-day Pro trial. Does not outrank PagerDuty 8.0.
Best for
- • Teams that want incident command with a 10-responder free path
- • Buyers comparing FireHydrant Pro $25 to Rootly $20 and incident.io Team $15
- • Orgs that will keep PagerDuty for paging and add FireHydrant for command
Starting from $25.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
New Relic is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
- ✓ Security & admin
Tie
- • Free plan
- • Integrations
Choose FireHydrant if: Teams that want incident command with a 10-responder free path
Choose New Relic if: Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill

New Relic
Observability — Free 100 GB ingest + 1 full user; Standard from $10 first full user then $99; data $0.40/GB after 100 GB; Pro $349/full user annual.
Best for
- • Teams that want APM + logs + infra in one ingest bill
- • Orgs that can live with 1–5 Standard full users
- • Buyers comparing usage-based observability to Datadog hosts
Starting from $10.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
6
Criteria
5
Screenshots
6
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| FireHydrant — Official Site | FireHydrant | official-product-page |
| FireHydrant Pricing | FireHydrant | official-pricing-page |
| FireHydrant pricing | FireHydrant | official-product-page |
| New Relic — Official Site | New Relic | official-product-page |
| New Relic Pricing | New Relic | official-pricing-page |
| New Relic pricing | New Relic | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.