SoftwareGlimpse

FireHydrant vs HaloITSM

Compare FireHydrant and HaloITSM on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20266 evidence sources2 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
FireHydrant logo

FireHydrant

7.7/10

Incident response — Free up to 10 responders; Pro $25/responder/mo annual; Enterprise custom; 14-day Pro trial. Does not outrank PagerDuty 8.0.

Best for

  • Teams that want incident command with a 10-responder free path
  • Buyers comparing FireHydrant Pro $25 to Rootly $20 and incident.io Team $15
  • Orgs that will keep PagerDuty for paging and add FireHydrant for command

Starting from $25.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

FireHydrant is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Free plan

HaloITSM is better for

  • Security & admin

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose FireHydrant if: Teams that want incident command with a 10-responder free path

Choose HaloITSM if: IT teams that want an all-in-one per-agent ITSM calculator rather than edition ladders

See detailed comparison ↓
HaloITSM logo

HaloITSM

7.9/10

All-in-one ITSM — first-party UK calculator ~£66/agent/mo annual; onboarding packages extra. Does not outrank ServiceNow 8.7 / Freshservice 8.4.

Best for

  • IT teams that want an all-in-one per-agent ITSM calculator rather than edition ladders
  • UK/GBP buyers who will model £66 annual plus onboarding
  • Desks comparing HaloITSM to SysAid quotes and ManageEngine $13 Standard

Starting from $66.00/user/mo

No free plan

Screenshots

Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.

FireHydrant

HaloITSM

No screenshots in this filter.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.