Fastmail vs Grasshopper
Compare Fastmail and Grasshopper on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Fastmail
Privacy-focused business email, calendar and contacts with custom domains and shared addresses — Business Basic from $3/user/month annual; adjacent to business communications, not a phone system.
Best for
- • Small teams that want private, independent business email on their own domain
- • Owner-operators who need shared support@ addresses and shared calendars cheaply
- • Buyers who need an email retention archive for legal compliance (Professional)
Starting from $3.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Grasshopper is better for
- ✓ Number / country coverage
- ✓ Power dialer
- ✓ Routing & IVR
- ✓ Analytics
Tie
- • WhatsApp Business
- • CRM / CTI integrations
Choose Fastmail if: Small teams that want private, independent business email on their own domain
Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
Grasshopper
SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).
Best for
- • Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
- • SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
- • Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line
Starting from $14.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
5
Criteria
9
Screenshots
8
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Fastmail — Official Site | Fastmail | official-product-page |
| Fastmail Pricing | Fastmail | official-pricing-page |
| Fastmail for Business | Fastmail | official-product-page |
| Grasshopper — Official Site | Grasshopper | official-product-page |
| Grasshopper Pricing | Grasshopper | official-pricing-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.