SoftwareGlimpse

Cursor vs Gamma

Compare Cursor and Gamma on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Cursor logo

Cursor

8.4/10

AI-native code editor — Hobby free; Pro $20/mo; Teams Standard $40/user; Enterprise contact. Usage credits inside paid plans.

Best for

  • Developers who want an AI-native editor rather than a plugin
  • Teams running Agent-heavy refactors with MCP/tools
  • Orgs ready for Teams SSO and privacy modes

Starting from $20.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Cursor is better for

  • LLM assistant depth
  • Writing assistance
  • Agent / builder depth
  • Governance & privacy

Gamma is better for

  • Usage / credits model

Tie

  • Free plan
  • Voice / TTS depth

Choose Cursor if: Developers who want an AI-native editor rather than a plugin

Choose Gamma if: Founders and marketers who need fast AI-generated pitch decks

See detailed comparison ↓
Gamma logo

Gamma

7.7/10

AI presentation and document generator — Free; Plus $8/mo annual ($10 monthly).

Best for

  • Founders and marketers who need fast AI-generated pitch decks
  • Teams wanting docs and microsites without PowerPoint or Figma skills
  • Budget buyers who need presentation output, not full LLM chat

Starting from $8.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Cursor and Gamma. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    Depends

    Cursor researched starting price from $20/mo; a free plan is researched; Gamma researched starting price from $8/mo; a free plan is researched. Better value depends on plan rungs and add-ons.

    CursorDepends
    GammaDepends
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Tie

    Cursor researches a free plan; Gamma researches a free plan.

    CursorTie
    GammaTie
  • User / licence minimum

    Seat floors, per-employee minimums, and small-team pricing traps.

    Depends

    Check user minimum for Cursor and Gamma on current vendor packaging.

    CursorDepends
    GammaDepends
  • LLM assistant depth

    Chat, reasoning, and general-purpose assistant depth for the primary job.

    Cursor

    Cursor leads on llm chat depth (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    CursorStronger
    GammaWeaker
  • Writing assistance

    Long-form writing, editing, and document analysis quality.

    Cursor

    Cursor leads on writing depth (9/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    CursorStronger
    GammaWeaker
  • Voice / TTS depth

    Speech, voice mode, and text-to-speech capability when relevant.

    Tie

    Cursor and Gamma have the same researched availability on voice tts (Cursor: not-supported; Gamma: not-supported); meeting notes (Cursor: not-supported; Gamma: unknown).

    CursorTie
    GammaTie
  • Agent / builder depth

    Custom projects, agents, GPTs, and workflow builders beyond bare chat.

    Cursor

    Stronger agent builder availability

    CursorStronger
    GammaWeaker
  • Governance & privacy

    Admin controls, data retention, and enterprise privacy packaging.

    Cursor

    Cursor leads on governance (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    CursorStronger
    GammaWeaker
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Cursor

    Cursor leads on integrations (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Cursor8/10
    Gamma6/10
  • Usage / credits model

    How free caps, seats, credits, and overages affect real cost.

    Gamma

    Gamma leads on usage model (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    CursorWeaker
    GammaStronger

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.